Safety and Efficacy of a Novel Sealant‐Based Vascular Closure Device Following Electrophysiology Procedures: ReliaSeal Trial.

Background: While manual compression (MC) remains the standard of care to achieve hemostasis, a novel vascular closure device (VCD) was designed to achieve faster hemostasis without compromising safety. The objective of the ReliaSeal trial was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Mynx Con...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology Vol. 36; no. 5; pp. 1022 - 1032
Autores principales: Summers, John, Swarup, Vijay, Parker, Ian, Bumgarner, Joseph, Brenyo, Andrew, Saleh, Layth, Sadanandan, Saihari, Sanchez, Javier, Beasley, Robert, Gupta, Sanjaya, Akram Khan, Muhammad, Pascual, Mario, Ramirez, Norman, Sultana, Nusrath, Adams, George
Formato: diagnostic images research tables/charts randomized controlled trial Journal Article
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell May2025
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=185153657&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 185153657
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        10453873
        GSB
      jtl: Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology
      issn: 10453873
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: May2025
      vid: 36
      iid: 5
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
      place: Malden, Massachusetts
    artinfo:
      ui:
        185153657
        183747648
        185153657
        185153657
        10.1111/jce.16623
        185153657
      ppf: 1022
      ppct: 10
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: C
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: Safety and Efficacy of a Novel Sealant‐Based Vascular Closure Device Following Electrophysiology Procedures: ReliaSeal Trial.
      aug:
        au:
          Summers, John
          Swarup, Vijay
          Parker, Ian
          Bumgarner, Joseph
          Brenyo, Andrew
          Saleh, Layth
          Sadanandan, Saihari
          Sanchez, Javier
          Beasley, Robert
          Gupta, Sanjaya
          Akram Khan, Muhammad
          Pascual, Mario
          Ramirez, Norman
          Sultana, Nusrath
          Adams, George
        affil: South Oklahoma Heart Research Center, Oklahoma City Oklahoma,, USA
      sug:
        subj:
          Patient Safety Evaluation
          Treatment Outcomes Evaluation
          Vascular Closure Devices
          Catheterization
          Surgical Site
          Lower Extremity Surgery
          Human
          Prospective Studies
          Randomized Controlled Trials
          Middle Age
          Aged
          Time Factors
          Walking
          Hemostasis
          Patient Discharge
          Descriptive Statistics
          Compression Therapy Adverse Effects
          Funding Source
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
          Aged: 65+ years
      ab: Background: While manual compression (MC) remains the standard of care to achieve hemostasis, a novel vascular closure device (VCD) was designed to achieve faster hemostasis without compromising safety. The objective of the ReliaSeal trial was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Mynx Control Venous VCD to close a single or multiple femoral venous access sites in one or both limbs in patients undergoing catheter‐based procedures. Methods: The ReliaSeal trial was a prospective, randomized controlled trial comparing VCD to MC in patients undergoing catheter‐based procedures requiring single or multiple access sites utilizing up to 12F sheaths. Endpoints included time to ambulation (TTA), time to hemostasis (TTH), time to discharge eligibility (TTDE), procedural/device success, and 30‐day major and minor access site complications. Results: Two hundred and seventy subjects were randomized to the VCD or MC arm (n = 177 vs. n = 93) with a mean age of 66.7 ± 11.27 years. TTA, TTH, and TTDE were significantly reduced in VCD subjects compared to MC (TTA: 2.6 ± 1.03 vs. 5.1 ± 4.35 h, p < 0.001; TTH: 2.1 ± 1.79 vs. 11.4 ± 7.19 min, p < 0.001; TTDE: 3.1 ± 1.24 vs. 5.5 ± 4.58 h, p < 0.001, respectively). Procedural and device success was achieved in 100% of VCD subjects, compared to 98.9% of the MC group. No major or minor complications occurred in the VCD group; with a 5% minor complication rate in the MC group. Conclusion: The use of VCD resulted in significant reductions in TTA, TTH, and TTDE, with no major or minor complications and a high success rate. Summary: What is known:Manual compression (MC) remains the standard of care to achieve hemostasis following catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation at many hospitals.There is a growing need to achieve efficient, safe, and effective post‐procedure venous hemostasis in order to improve the post‐procedure recovery process to reduce vascular access complications, reduce patient discomfort, and shorten the recovery period to facilitate same‐day discharge.What the study adds:The ReliaSeal trial was a prospective, randomized controlled trial comparing vascular closure devices (VCD) to manual compression (MC) in patients undergoing catheter‐based procedures requiring single or multiple access sites utilizing up to 12F sheaths.Compared to subjects receiving MC, there was a shorter time to ambulation (TTA), time to hemostasis (TTH), and time to discharge eligibility (TTDE) in subjects receiving VCD.VCD use was associated with a high success rate with no major or minor complications.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        diagnostic images
        research
        tables/charts
        randomized controlled trial
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N