Sitting pressure during wheelchair propulsion and handcycling: effects of backrest angle, movement intensity and cushion type.

Purpose: The main aim of this study was to compare sitting pressure (peak pressure index (PPI) and peak pressure gradient (PPG)) between a daily wheelchair and fixed-frame handcycle, thereby assessing the effect of handcycle backrest angle, movement intensity and cushion type. Materials and methods:...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Disability & Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology Vol. 20; no. 4; pp. 1094 - 1104
Autores principales: Snoek, Thom, Haarler, Annelaura, van Orsouw, Ludwine, Janssen, Thomas W. J., de Groot, Sonja, Kouwijzer, Ingrid
Formato: pictorial research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Taylor & Francis Ltd May2025
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=185198492&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 185198492
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        17483107
        1X04
      jtl: Disability & Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology
      issn: 17483107
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: May2025
      vid: 20
      iid: 4
      pid: 377
      pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd
      place: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
    artinfo:
      ui:
        185198492
        181187941
        185198492
        185198492
        10.1080/17483107.2024.2434912
        185198492
      ppf: 1094
      ppct: 10
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: Sitting pressure during wheelchair propulsion and handcycling: effects of backrest angle, movement intensity and cushion type.
      aug:
        au:
          Snoek, Thom
          Haarler, Annelaura
          van Orsouw, Ludwine
          Janssen, Thomas W. J.
          de Groot, Sonja
          Kouwijzer, Ingrid
        affil: Department of Human Movement Sciences, Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
      sug:
        subj:
          Spinal Cord Injuries Rehabilitation
          Pressure Ulcer
          Wheelchairs
          Ergonomics
          Sitting
          Body Positions
          Movement Physiology
          Equipment Design
          Hand Physiology
          Task Performance and Analysis
          Biomechanics Evaluation
          Pillows and Cushions
          Pressure (Physiology)
          Human
          Male
          Female
          Young Adult
          Physical Performance
          Kinematics
          Descriptive Statistics
          Data Analysis Software
          Repeated Measures
          Analysis of Variance
          Post Hoc Analysis
          Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
          Skin Physiology
          Questionnaires
          Adaptive Seating
          Male
          Female
      ab: Purpose: The main aim of this study was to compare sitting pressure (peak pressure index (PPI) and peak pressure gradient (PPG)) between a daily wheelchair and fixed-frame handcycle, thereby assessing the effect of handcycle backrest angle, movement intensity and cushion type. Materials and methods: Twenty able-bodied participants performed static and dynamic (two intensities) tests in a wheelchair and handcycle. A honeycomb wheelchair cushion and standard foam handcycle cushion were used. Handcycle backrest angles were 45° and 60°. The PPI and PPG at the sacro-coccygeal (SC) and ischial tuberosity (IT) regions were determined with a pressure mat. Results: PPI at the IT-region was higher in the 60° handcycle condition than in the wheelchair (p = 0.04), while PPG at the IT-region did not differ significantly between the wheelchair and handcycle conditions (p > 0.05). PPI and PPG were higher at the 45° handcycle SC-region compared to the wheelchair IT-region (p < 0.03). PPI and PPG at the IT-region were higher with the 60° than with the 45° backrest angle (p < 0.01), while at the SC-region PPI was higher with the 45° backrest angle (p = 0.047). No clear influence of movement intensity was found. PPI and PPG at the IT-region and PPI of the SC-region in the handcycle were significantly lower with the wheelchair cushion than with the handcycle cushion (p < 0.01). Conclusion: Overall, sitting pressure was higher in the handcycle compared to the daily wheelchair. For handcyclists using an upright position, it is recommended to use a cushion designed to redistribute pressure, thereby reducing internal tissue pressure and shear. IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATION: Individuals with a spinal cord injury are at high risk of developing pressure ulcers at the ischial tuberosities (ITs) and the sacro-coccygeal (SC) region due to elevated sitting pressure. The sitting pressure at the IT-region is higher during handcycling in an upright position compared to wheelchair propulsion, while the sitting pressure at the SC-region is higher during handcycling in a less upright position. The use of a honeycomb wheelchair cushion reduces the sitting pressure in the handcycle compared to a standard foam handcycle cushion. For handcyclists, it is recommended to use a cushion designed to redistribute pressure, thereby reducing internal tissue pressure and shear.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        pictorial
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N