Barriers and facilitators to implementing a technology-enhanced psychiatric collaborative care model among rural primary care sites: a mixed-methods implementation case study.

Background: Psychiatric collaborative care management (CoCM) has potential to mitigate the challenges rural communities face accessing behavioral health (BH) services. However, implementation of CoCM in rural clinics has proved difficult and may benefit from a tailored approach. This study examines...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:BMC Primary Care Vol. 26; no. 1; pp. 1 - 19
Autores principales: Kruis, Ryan, Johnson, Emily, Guille, Constance, Sprouse-McClam, Candace, Alkis, Andrew, McElligott, James, Harvey, Jillian
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: BioMed Central 5/20/2025
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=185280360&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 185280360
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        27314553
        MZZU
      jtl: BMC Primary Care
      issn: 27314553
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: 5/20/2025
      vid: 26
      iid: 1
      pid: 24147
      pub: BioMed Central
    artinfo:
      ui:
        185280360
        185280360
        185280360
        10.1186/s12875-025-02839-5
        185280360
      ppf: 1
      ppct: 18
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Barriers and facilitators to implementing a technology-enhanced psychiatric collaborative care model among rural primary care sites: a mixed-methods implementation case study.
      aug:
        au:
          Kruis, Ryan
          Johnson, Emily
          Guille, Constance
          Sprouse-McClam, Candace
          Alkis, Andrew
          McElligott, James
          Harvey, Jillian
        affil: Manatt Health Strategies, Chicago, IL, USA
      sug:
        subj:
          Telepsychiatry
          Primary Health Care
          Rural Health Services
          Mental Disorders Therapy
          Health Services Accessibility Evaluation
          Implementation Science
          Psychiatric Service
          Collaboration
          Human
          South Carolina
          Funding Source
          Male
          Female
          Adult
          Middle Age
          Aged
          Multimethod Studies
          Case Studies
          Surveys
          Focus Groups
          Interviews
          Workflow
          Feedback
          Job Satisfaction
          Psychiatric Patients
          Needs Assessment
          Adult: 19-44 years
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
          Aged: 65+ years
          Male
          Female
      ab: Background: Psychiatric collaborative care management (CoCM) has potential to mitigate the challenges rural communities face accessing behavioral health (BH) services. However, implementation of CoCM in rural clinics has proved difficult and may benefit from a tailored approach. This study examines implementation of a telehealth-enabled CoCM program in four rural South Carolina clinics guided by the Dynamic Adaptation Process (DAP), with particular focus on identifying barriers, facilitators, and strategies to support implementation. Methods: This study used a mixed-methods, embedded, chronological case study approach, integrating several data sources collected longitudinally during implementation. Data included surveys, focus groups, key informant interviews, and administrative data. Data were integrated using a weaving approach to develop summaries of each of the DAP phases of program implementation (Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment). Results: Initial Exploration implementation activities included workflow development, telehealth platform configuration, building the CoCM provider team, and conducting an assessment among implementation clinics. Scarcity of BH resources was the primary barrier to rural BH treatment, leading to strong anticipated fit of the CoCM pilot among providers. These data informed activities and adaptations in subsequent phases. During the Preparation phase, the CoCM team was trained and site visits were conducted by the remote care manager to build rapport with clinic staff. In Implementation, the pilot launched, receiving 296 referrals and 99 patient enrollments in the first eight months. Post-implementation feedback showed strong provider satisfaction. Patient need, patient interest, and provider engagement with the care manager were identified as the primary facilitators for referral. During the Sustainment phase, workflow, technology, and auditing process improvements took place alongside planning for future program expansion. Conclusionl: The DAP shows great utility for tailoring implementation of CoCM to specific rural settings by providing a roadmap for identifying contextual barriers and facilitators that can be addressed through adaptation and other implementation strategies.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N