The finite subject and reflection in Jan Patočka.

How should we conceive of the relationship between finite subjectivity and reflection? And what implications does this have for the phenomenological method? This article addresses these questions by reconstructing the main pillars of Patočka's theory of the subject. I present three of Patočka's key...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Studies in East European Thought Vol. 77; no. 3; pp. 427 - 446
Autor principal: Barcaro, Marco
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Springer Nature Jun2025
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=185303230&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 185303230
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        09259392
        GGL
      jtl: Studies in East European Thought
      issn: 09259392
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jun2025
      vid: 77
      iid: 3
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
    artinfo:
      ui:
        185303230
        10.1007/s11212-024-09646-1
      ppf: 427
      ppct: 19
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 985KB
      tig:
        atl: The finite subject and reflection in Jan Patočka.
      aug:
        au: Barcaro, Marco
        affil: Facoltà Teologica del Triveneto, via del Seminario 7, 35122, Padua, Italy
      su:
        Reflection (Philosophy)
        Religious studies
        Consciousness
        Phenomenology
        Argument
      sug:
        subj:
          Reflection (Philosophy)
          Religious studies
          Consciousness
          Phenomenology
          Argument
      keyword:
        Epoché
        Philosophy and Religious Studies Philosophy
        Reduction
        Reflection
        Sum
        Time
        World
      ab: How should we conceive of the relationship between finite subjectivity and reflection? And what implications does this have for the phenomenological method? This article addresses these questions by reconstructing the main pillars of Patočka's theory of the subject. I present three of Patočka's key arguments related to finitude, consciousness, and the world (the primacy of the sum, the reduction to immanence, and temporality); then, after every argument, I outline their implications for Patočka's philosophy. In particular, I highlight how Patočka's thought implies a repositioning of the subject in the world to which it ontologically belongs and a reassessment of the meaning of reflection. These theoretical assumptions open phenomenology to a different understanding of the subject than it had previously possessed and promote rich analysis of the movements of existence. The most important implication of Patočka's theory of finite subjectivity, however, concerns the concept of the world, which bear a significance that extends beyond its critical position vis-à-vis transcendental subjectivity.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Studies in East European Thought is a copyright of Springer, 2025. All Rights Reserved.
      item: Studies in East European Thought
      holder: Springer Nature
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2025
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N