What a jerk!

I argue that "general pejoratives" such as "jerk" or "bastard" differ crucially from items such as "that damn N". While items such as the latter typically serve to give vent to one's attitudes, general pejoratives essentially involve judgments about a person's behaviour or character. This is particu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:European Journal of Philosophy Vol. 33; no. 2; pp. 458 - 475
Autor principal: Sander, Thorsten
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Jun2025
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=185398366&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 185398366
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        09668373
        7PU
      jtl: European Journal of Philosophy
      issn: 09668373
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jun2025
      vid: 33
      iid: 2
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
    artinfo:
      ui:
        185398366
        10.1111/ejop.13007
      ppf: 458
      ppct: 17
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 1.5MB
      tig:
        atl: What a jerk!
      aug:
        au: Sander, Thorsten
        affil: Universität Duisburg‐Essen, Institut für Philosophie, Essen
      su:
        Conditionals (Logic)
        Philosophy
        Metaphysics
        Discriminatory language
        Epithets
      sug:
        subj:
          Conditionals (Logic)
          Philosophy
          Metaphysics
          Discriminatory language
          Epithets
      keyword:
        expressives
        general pejoratives
        non‐at‐issue contents
        particularistic pejoratives
        personal slurs
      ab: I argue that "general pejoratives" such as "jerk" or "bastard" differ crucially from items such as "that damn N". While items such as the latter typically serve to give vent to one's attitudes, general pejoratives essentially involve judgments about a person's behaviour or character. This is particularly evident in cases where pejoratives occur not as epithets, but as predicate nominals. If we want to account for the overall contribution of words such as "jerk", there are three kinds of content that ought to be distinguished: truth‐conditional contents, evaluative presuppositions, and expressive contents that are either at‐issue (in the case of expressive predicates) or non‐at‐issue (in the case of epithets).
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of European Journal of Philosophy is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: European Journal of Philosophy
      holder: Wiley-Blackwell
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2025
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N