Evaluation of a research hearing aid for audiological testing.

Objective: Open-source hearing aid (HA) research tools provide avenues for testing new audiological concepts. This study compared a wearable research HA (RHA) – the "Portable Hearing Laboratory" – to a high-end commercial HA (CHA) in terms of aided outcome. Using this RHA, it also evaluated a fittin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:International Journal of Audiology Vol. 64; no. 6; pp. 599 - 609
Autores principales: Andersen, Pernilla K., Jürgensen, Lukas, Denk, Florian, Husstedt, Hendrik, Jürgens, Tim, Neher, Tobias
Formato: pictorial research tables/charts randomized controlled trial Journal Article
Publicado: Taylor & Francis Ltd Jun2025
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=185628501&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 185628501
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        14992027
        JW2
      jtl: International Journal of Audiology
      issn: 14992027
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jun2025
      vid: 64
      iid: 6
      pid: 377
      pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd
      place: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
    artinfo:
      ui:
        185628501
        181105230
        185628501
        185628501
        10.1080/14992027.2024.2431830
        185628501
      ppf: 599
      ppct: 10
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: Evaluation of a research hearing aid for audiological testing.
      aug:
        au:
          Andersen, Pernilla K.
          Jürgensen, Lukas
          Denk, Florian
          Husstedt, Hendrik
          Jürgens, Tim
          Neher, Tobias
        affil: Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
      sug:
        subj:
          Hearing Aids Evaluation
          Hearing Aid Fitting Evaluation
          Portable Equipment Evaluation
          Hearing Tests
          Product Evaluation
          Human
          Middle Age
          Aged
          Male
          Female
          Funding Source
          Denmark
          Randomized Controlled Trials
          Research, Speech-Language-Hearing Therapy
          Comparative Studies
          Speech Perception
          Quality Assessment
          Transducers
          Assistive Listening Systems
          Hearing Loss, Sensorineural
          Voice Quality
          Exploratory Research
          Academic Medical Centers
          Descriptive Statistics
          Speech Intelligibility
          Scales
          Voice Recognition Systems
          Data Analysis Software
          Analysis of Variance
          Post Hoc Analysis
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
          Aged: 65+ years
          Male
          Female
      ab: Objective: Open-source hearing aid (HA) research tools provide avenues for testing new audiological concepts. This study compared a wearable research HA (RHA) – the "Portable Hearing Laboratory" – to a high-end commercial HA (CHA) in terms of aided outcome. Using this RHA, it also evaluated a fitting approach based on non-individualised gain presets. Design: Using a randomised repeated-measures design, participants completed speech recognition and speech quality assessments under unaided and several aided (RHA and CHA with omnidirectional and directional microphone settings) conditions. Furthermore, two approaches for prescribing amplification were evaluated with the RHA: (1) a preset approach based on non-verified clinical gain targets calculated for three standard audiograms, and (2) a best-practice approach based on individually prescribed and verified clinical gain targets. Study sample: Fifteen adults aged 50–78 years with symmetrical, mild-to-moderate sensorineural hearing losses. Results: The RHA and CHA gave similar audibility, speech recognition in quiet and in noise, and speech quality ratings in quiet and in noise. Relative to the best-practice approach, the preset approach resulted in less audibility but similar speech recognition in quiet and in noise. Conclusion: The RHA appears suited for testing new audiological concepts such as preset-based approaches to HA fitting.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        pictorial
        research
        tables/charts
        randomized controlled trial
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N