Moral dilemmas and slow codes.

Slow codes—insincere attempts at resuscitation—are widely regarded in medicine and medical ethics as morally impermissible. My goal here is to enrich this special issue on the slow code with an argument for the permissibility of slow codes that is rooted in moral psychology. Specifically, if we take...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Bioethics Vol. 39; no. 4; pp. 359 - 368
Autor principal: Crutchfield, Parker
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell May2025
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=185679522&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 185679522
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        02699702
        6PJ
      jtl: Bioethics
      issn: 02699702
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: May2025
      vid: 39
      iid: 4
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
    artinfo:
      ui:
        185679522
        10.1111/bioe.13399
      ppf: 359
      ppct: 9
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Moral dilemmas and slow codes.
      aug:
        au: Crutchfield, Parker
        affil: Department of Medical Ethics, Humanities, and Law, Western Michigan University Homer Stryker M.D. School of Medicine, Kalamazoo Michigan, , USA
      su:
        Do-not-resuscitate orders
        Codes of ethics
        Decision making
        Futile medical care
        Emotions
        Ethics
        Judgment (Psychology)
        Medical ethics
        Ethical problems
        Cardiopulmonary resuscitation
        Social distancing
      sug:
        subj:
          Do-not-resuscitate orders
          Codes of ethics
          Decision making
          Futile medical care
          Emotions
          Ethics
          Judgment (Psychology)
          Medical ethics
          Ethical problems
          Cardiopulmonary resuscitation
          Social distancing
      keyword:
        deception
        moral psychology
        slow code
        trolley problem
        deception
        moral psychology
        slow code
        trolley problem
      ab: Slow codes—insincere attempts at resuscitation—are widely regarded in medicine and medical ethics as morally impermissible. My goal here is to enrich this special issue on the slow code with an argument for the permissibility of slow codes that is rooted in moral psychology. Specifically, if we take seriously the results from moral psychology, the slow code is not only permissible, it is often the best option. The context of the decision about whether to perform a slow code is analogous to thoroughly investigated moral dilemmas such as the trolley problem. In particular, when the trolley problem is framed as a trilemma, it becomes clear that the decisional context of the slow code is analogous to the famous moral dilemma. Since in the trolley problem the choice analogous to the slow code is the best choice, the slow code may be the best choice when facing patient or family requests for futile CPR. In establishing this claim, I address a range of objections to the slow code. I conclude with an empirically supported explanation of the conventional wisdom. Resistance to the slow code doesn't sprout from the act's moral properties, but from moral judgments influenced by other factors, such as emotion, physical distance, and personal force.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N