Reporting the standard error of the mean: a critical analysis of three journals in manual medicine.

Background: In the realm of biomedical research articles, authors typically utilize descriptive statistics to outline the characteristics of their study samples. The standard deviation (SD) serves to illustrate variability among the individuals in a sample, whereas the standard error of the mean (SE...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Chiropractic & Manual Therapies Vol. 33; no. 1; pp. 1 - 10
Autores principales: Manovic, Alen, Immelsjö, Ebba, Axen, Iben, Palmgren, Per J.
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: BioMed Central 6/4/2025
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=185686116&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 185686116
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        2045709X
        BG1Z
      jtl: Chiropractic & Manual Therapies
      issn: 2045709X
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: 6/4/2025
      vid: 33
      iid: 1
      pid: 24147
      pub: BioMed Central
    artinfo:
      ui:
        185686116
        185686116
        185686116
        10.1186/s12998-025-00587-y
        185686116
      ppf: 1
      ppct: 9
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: Reporting the standard error of the mean: a critical analysis of three journals in manual medicine.
      aug:
        au:
          Manovic, Alen
          Immelsjö, Ebba
          Axen, Iben
          Palmgren, Per J.
        affil: Hälsosam Rörlighet Naprapati, Friledningsgatan 3B, 721 37, Västerås, Sweden
      sug:
        subj:
          Manual Therapy
          Newsletters
          Inappropriate Prescribing
          Data Analysis, Statistical
          Research, Medical
          Serial Publications
          Chiropractic
          Inferential Statistics
          Publishing
          Musculoskeletal Diseases Therapy
          Human
          Male
          Female
          Quantitative Studies
          Retrospective Design
          Record Review
          Descriptive Statistics
          Data Analysis Software
          Chi Square Test
          Fisher's Exact Test
          Post Hoc Analysis
          Probability
          Manipulation, Chiropractic
          Reproducibility of Results
          Male
          Female
      ab: Background: In the realm of biomedical research articles, authors typically utilize descriptive statistics to outline the characteristics of their study samples. The standard deviation (SD) serves to illustrate variability among the individuals in a sample, whereas the standard error of the mean (SEM) conveys the level of uncertainty associated with the sample mean's representation of the population mean. It is not unusual for authors of scientific articles to incorrectly utilize the SEM rather than the SD when explaining data variability. This is problematic because the SEM is consistently smaller than the SD, which could cause readers to underestimate variation in the data. In medical journals, inappropriate use has been found in 14–64% of articles. Moreover, in the field of musculoskeletal health and manual medicine, there is a noticeable absence of literature on the appropriate presentation of statistics. Aim: The aim of this study was to map the frequency of inappropriate reporting of SEM in articles published over a three-year period in three prominent journals in manual medicine. Methods: In this critical analysis, all articles in three journals – BMC Chiropractic and Manual Therapies (CMT), Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics (JMPT) and Musculoskeletal Science and Practice: An International Journal of Musculoskeletal Physiotherapy (MSP) – published between 2017 and 2019 were analysed based on descriptive statistics that inappropriately or vaguely reported SEMs. Results: In total, 790 articles were analysed from the three journals, 487 of which were found to report the SEM. Among these articles, we identified a frequency of 1.4% of inadequate SEM use. The investigation also showed that in 2.5% of the cases, authors did not clarify whether the ± sign presented in text, tables or figures expressed SDs or SEMs. Conclusion: There was a low frequency (1.4%) of inaccurately reported SEMs in scientific journals focusing on manual medicine, which was notably lower than studies conducted in other fields. Additionally, it was noted that in 2.5% of the articles, the ± sign was not adequately defined, which could lead to confusion among readers and hinder the interpretation of the results.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N