Value in a limitless world.

We argue that three theses involving three separate areas of philosophy jointly yield an interesting but overlooked result. The first is from the metaphysics of mind, and says that everything is conscious (Panpsychism). The second is axiological, and says that, necessarily, every instance of conscio...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Synthese Vol. 205; no. 6; pp. 1 - 23
Main Authors: Giberman, Daniel, Shupe, Eli
Format: Article
Published: Springer Nature Jun2025
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=185743923&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 185743923
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00397857
        4LI
      jtl: Synthese
      issn: 00397857
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jun2025
      vid: 205
      iid: 6
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
    artinfo:
      ui:
        185743923
        10.1007/s11229-025-05070-y
      ppf: 1
      ppct: 22
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 953KB
      tig:
        atl: Value in a limitless world.
      aug:
        au:
          Giberman, Daniel
          Shupe, Eli
        affil:
          https://ror.org/01tm6cn81 Department of Philosophy, Linguistics, and Theory of Science (FLoV), University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
          https://ror.org/019kgqr73 Department of Philosophy and Humanities, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, USA
      sug:
      keyword:
        Consciousness
        Gunk
        Mereology
        Panpsychism
        Philosophy and Religious Studies Philosophy
        Value of consciousness
      ab: We argue that three theses involving three separate areas of philosophy jointly yield an interesting but overlooked result. The first is from the metaphysics of mind, and says that everything is conscious (Panpsychism). The second is axiological, and says that, necessarily, every instance of consciousness is intrinsically valuable (Value). The third is from mereology, and says that everything has proper parts (Gunk). The result is that every non-panpsychist or non-gunk world of finite value is infinitely less valuable than the closest panpsychist gunk world. In short, if consciousness is intrinsically valuable then the joint obtaining of panpsychism and gunk would make a great many things—perhaps everything—better. In addition to its independent interest, this result shows that if consciousness is intrinsically valuable then the best of all possible appropriately finite worlds (and perhaps the best of all possible worlds, full stop) are panpsychist and gunky.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Synthese is a copyright of Springer, 2025. All Rights Reserved.
      item: Synthese
      holder: Springer Nature
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2025
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N