Elite Economists and the Neoliberal Ascendancy in Australia: The Case of Dr John Hewson.

Worsening inequality worldwide has stimulated a renewal of scholarly work on the dynamics of elite recruitment, notably Aaron Reeves and Sam Friedman's large-scale UK study (2024), which found only modest change in the make-up of Britain's elite between the 1890s and today. Cumulative advantage is s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Australian Studies Vol. 49; no. 2; pp. 218 - 234
Autor principal: Wallace, Chris
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Taylor & Francis Ltd Jun2025
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=185784988&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 185784988
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        14443058
        3J2
      jtl: Journal of Australian Studies
      issn: 14443058
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jun2025
      vid: 49
      iid: 2
      pid: 377
      pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd
    artinfo:
      ui:
        185784988
        10.1080/14443058.2025.2495895
      ppf: 218
      ppct: 16
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 380KB
      tig:
        atl: Elite Economists and the Neoliberal Ascendancy in Australia: The Case of Dr John Hewson.
      aug:
        au: Wallace, Chris
        affil: School of Politics Economics and Society, University of Canberra, Canberra, Australia
      su:
        Neoliberalism
        Academic discourse
        Economic policy
        Cognitive consistency
        Australia
      sug:
        subj:
          Australia
          Neoliberalism
          Academic discourse
          Economic policy
          Cognitive consistency
      ab: Worsening inequality worldwide has stimulated a renewal of scholarly work on the dynamics of elite recruitment, notably Aaron Reeves and Sam Friedman's large-scale UK study (2024), which found only modest change in the make-up of Britain's elite between the 1890s and today. Cumulative advantage is shown to accrue to those who pass through more than one of Britain's "precise channels of elite recruitment". Reeves and Friedman's underlying motivation is to identify how these channels "might be remade so the elites we get are the ones we need"—implicitly, elites interested in reversing current trends in inequality. Australia presents an opportunity to consider their findings in a situation where, compared with Britain, elite recruitment is more nebulous. Drawing on the life and transnational career of Australian economist John Hewson, this article responds to Reeves and Friedman's invocation to evaluate "how elites think, and what elites do, rather than simply who they are". The dynamics of Hewson's elite recruitment and its relationship to his role in constructing consent for neoliberalism in Australia in the late 20th century—in the academy, the media and politics—is contextualised in the national and global history of neoliberalism.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Journal of Australian Studies is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Journal of Australian Studies
      holder: Taylor & Francis Ltd
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2025
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N