The Semitic "Perfect" and the Problem of the Third Person Zero Morpheme.

In many languages, third person forms in a verbal paradigm are unmarked, and scholars have suggested that such cases are either a result of loss or nondevelopment. In this paper I will argue that in the perfect/stative paradigm in Semitic, the third person morphology is a result of nondevelopment. I...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of the American Oriental Society Vol. 145; no. 2; pp. 327 - 348
Autor principal: PAT-EL, NA'AMA
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: American Society for Premodern Asia (ASPA) Apr-Jun2025
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=185982780&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 185982780
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid: JOY
      jtl: Journal of the American Oriental Society
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Apr-Jun2025
      vid: 145
      iid: 2
      pid: 1463
      pub: American Society for Premodern Asia (ASPA)
    artinfo:
      ui:
        185982780
        10.7817/jaos.145.2.2025.ar014
      ppf: 327
      ppct: 21
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 4.9MB
      tig:
        atl: The Semitic "Perfect" and the Problem of the Third Person Zero Morpheme.
      aug:
        au: PAT-EL, NA'AMA
        affil: UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS, AUSTIN
      su:
        Morphemics
        Morphology
        Semitic languages
        Pronouns
        Paradigm (Linguistics)
      sug:
        subj:
          Morphemics
          Morphology
          Semitic languages
          Pronouns
          Paradigm (Linguistics)
      ab: In many languages, third person forms in a verbal paradigm are unmarked, and scholars have suggested that such cases are either a result of loss or nondevelopment. In this paper I will argue that in the perfect/stative paradigm in Semitic, the third person morphology is a result of nondevelopment. I suggest that these forms are constructed as predicative adjectives, without person markers, because Semitic never developed third person nominative pronouns. I further discuss other innovative verbal formations in Semitic and show that when subject clitics are noncanonical, for example in Neo-Aramaic, third person forms are clearly marked.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Journal of the American Oriental Society is the property of American Society for Premodern Asia (ASPA) and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Journal of the American Oriental Society
      holder: American Society for Premodern Asia (ASPA)
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2025
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N