Dynamic assessment, more than a diagnostic tool? Uses for goals, teaching moments, and procedural issues during intervention of speech sound disorder.

Dynamic assessment is typically used for diagnostic and baseline purposes; however, the current study explored expanding the use of dynamic assessment as a curriculum-based measure to additionally capture teaching moments and observe intervention elements during treatment of speech sound disorder (N...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics Vol. 39; no. 4/5; pp. 352 - 374
Autores principales: Glaspey, Amy, MacLeod, Andrea A. N., Trumble, Pyper, Andersen, Megan
Formato: clinical trial research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Taylor & Francis Ltd Apr/May2025
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=185986547&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 185986547
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        02699206
        B6X
      jtl: Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics
      issn: 02699206
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Apr/May2025
      vid: 39
      iid: 4/5
      pid: 377
      pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd
      place: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
    artinfo:
      ui:
        185986547
        181404013
        185986547
        185986547
        10.1080/02699206.2024.2431926
        185986547
      ppf: 352
      ppct: 22
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: Dynamic assessment, more than a diagnostic tool? Uses for goals, teaching moments, and procedural issues during intervention of speech sound disorder.
      aug:
        au:
          Glaspey, Amy
          MacLeod, Andrea A. N.
          Trumble, Pyper
          Andersen, Megan
        affil: School of Speech, Language, Hearing, and Occupational Sciences, University of Montana, Missoula, Montana, USA
      sug:
        subj:
          Articulation Disorders, Functional Diagnosis
          Articulation Disorders, Functional Therapy
          Curriculum
          Articulation Disorders, Functional Education
          Treatment Outcomes
          Teaching Methods
          Human
          Male
          Child, Preschool
          Child
          Clinical Trials
          Children with Disabilities
          Classification
          Case Studies
          Articulation Disorders
          Scales
          Apraxia
          Dysarthria
          Child, Preschool: 2-5 years
          Child: 6-12 years
          Male
      ab: Dynamic assessment is typically used for diagnostic and baseline purposes; however, the current study explored expanding the use of dynamic assessment as a curriculum-based measure to additionally capture teaching moments and observe intervention elements during treatment of speech sound disorder (NCT06075303). Teaching moments occur when an SLT presents an antecedent, the child produces a behaviour, and the SLT responds with a consequence related to accuracy; yet, little is known about the characteristics of these elements that are the most essential for improving treatment outcomes. To address this gap, we used the Glaspey Dynamic Assessment of Phonology's scoring system to establish the goal, code teaching moments, describe procedural issues, and evaluate children's skill development. The participants included two English-speaking boys, ages three and six, with speech sound disorder. A modified cycles approach was administered by an SLT and a student clinician with two blocks of targets (minimally and moderately adaptable). Results indicated that coding with dynamic assessment was successfully used for tracking changes within the teaching moments and provided a more complete perspective of treatment efficacy when combined with outcome measures, yet more research is needed to establish goals with dynamic assessment. Both children demonstrated progress in a short period of time, though Participant 1 made more significant gains, which may be attributed to many elements including treatment intensity, target selection, clinician variables, or client variables. Overall, this preliminary research supports that dynamic assessment may lead to dynamic intervention, thus bridging assessment and treatment practices.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        clinical trial
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N