Navigating the impact of the 21st‐Century Cures Act Final Rule: A national cross‐sectional survey of US genetic counselors.
The 21st Century Cures Act Final Rule (Final Rule) increases patient access to their health records but raises concerns about distress and misunderstanding of automatically released results and documentation. Little is known about genetic counselors' (GCs') experiences with the Final Rule. In Fall 2...
| Publicado en: | Journal of Genetic Counseling Vol. 34; no. 3; pp. 1 - 19 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , , , , |
| Formato: | research tables/charts Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Wiley-Blackwell
Jun2025
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=186226422&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 186226422 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 10597700 41A jtl: Journal of Genetic Counseling issn: 10597700 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Jun2025 vid: 34 iid: 3 pid: 480 pub: Wiley-Blackwell place: Malden, Massachusetts artinfo: ui: 186226422 186226422 186226422 10.1002/jgc4.70005 186226422 ppf: 1 ppct: 18 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: C – @attributes: type: P tig: atl: Navigating the impact of the 21st‐Century Cures Act Final Rule: A national cross‐sectional survey of US genetic counselors. aug: au: Lowe, Chenery Duncan, Laura Morris, Victoria Anderson, Katherine Dratch, Laynie Mathews, Debra J. H. affil: Center for Biomedical Ethics, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University, Stanford California,, USA sug: subj: Genetic Counselors Psychosocial Factors Genetic Counseling Legislation and Jurisprudence Attitude of Health Personnel Health Policy Electronic Health Records Legislation and Jurisprudence Privacy and Confidentiality Electronic Data Interchange Patient Access to Records Legislation and Jurisprudence Human Funding Source United States Male Female Cross Sectional Studies Questionnaires Workflow Descriptive Statistics Fisher's Exact Test Communication Barriers Health Literacy Professional Role Patient Centered Care Stress, Psychological Healthcare Disparities Emotions Genetic Screening Patient Portals Male Female ab: The 21st Century Cures Act Final Rule (Final Rule) increases patient access to their health records but raises concerns about distress and misunderstanding of automatically released results and documentation. Little is known about genetic counselors' (GCs') experiences with the Final Rule. In Fall 2023, we conducted a cross‐sectional survey of US GCs about the Final Rule's perceived impact on practice and assessed if being the ordering versus non‐ordering provider for genetic testing affected perceptions of Final Rule‐related changes. GCs (n = 102) reported demographic and workplace characteristics, institutional policy changes, workflow changes, and perceived patient harms and benefits due to the Final Rule. To compare ordering and non‐ordering providers, we conducted Fisher's exact tests for categorical variables and trend tests for ordinal variables. Open‐response questions elicited examples of positive and negative patient impacts, the effects of patient characteristics, and practice changes in response to the Final Rule. Twenty‐seven GCs were ordering providers and 66 were non‐ordering providers. Relative to ordering providers, non‐ordering providers expressed stronger agreement with statements indicating concern about the emotional impact on patients reviewing results or notes without support (p = 0.002, 33% vs. 51% strongly agree), patients misunderstanding or misinterpreting results (p = 0.025, 44% vs. 70% strongly agree), and patients contacting the inappropriate party to discuss results (p = 0.023, 19% vs. 48% strongly agree). Agreement with the statement "patients have more knowledge/context/questions at our disclosure session due to previous results review" also differed by ordering provider status (p = 0.007). In open responses, GCs expressed concerns about patients' strong emotional reactions, patients misinterpreting results, workflow disruptions, and widening health disparities. Benefits included patients' ability to be reassured, informed, or empowered earlier; ease of sharing health information; more efficient workflow due to the automatic release of results. These results emphasize the importance of clear communication within health systems and between patients and providers. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: research tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|