Defending Nihilism About Musical Works.

According to nihilism, musical works do not exist. Platonism, on the other hand, states that they do exist—qua abstract objects of some sort. Given that denying the existence of musical works is rather counterintuitive, it does not come as a surprise that nihilism is considerably less popular than p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Philosophia Vol. 53; no. 1; pp. 347 - 366
Autor principal: Aliyev, Alexey
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Springer Nature Mar2025
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=186288649&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 186288649
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00483893
        1VPF
      jtl: Philosophia
      issn: 00483893
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Mar2025
      vid: 53
      iid: 1
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
    artinfo:
      ui:
        186288649
        10.1007/s11406-025-00844-7
      ppf: 347
      ppct: 19
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 895KB
      tig:
        atl: Defending Nihilism About Musical Works.
      aug:
        au: Aliyev, Alexey
        affil: https://ror.org/055f7t516 School of Philosophy and Cultural Studies, HSE University, Moscow, Russia
      su:
        Nihilism (Philosophy)
        Nominalism
        Platonists
        Realism
        Philosophy
      sug:
        subj:
          Nihilism (Philosophy)
          Nominalism
          Platonists
          Realism
          Philosophy
      keyword:
        Abstract objects
        Anti-realism
        Nihilism
        Ontological methodology
        Ontology of musical works
        Platonism
      ab: According to nihilism, musical works do not exist. Platonism, on the other hand, states that they do exist—qua abstract objects of some sort. Given that denying the existence of musical works is rather counterintuitive, it does not come as a surprise that nihilism is considerably less popular than platonism. This is not to say that among ontologists, no one prefers nihilism. But an overwhelming majority of them are on the platonist side. Is this situation justified? Presumably, the answer is "yes" only if platonism is more theoretically virtuous than nihilism. My goal in this paper is to show that under certain widely held methodological assumptions, the given condition is not satisfied: The theoretical merits of nihilism are, on balance, at least comparable to those of platonism. This result, if true, provides a powerful motivation to call into question the dominance of platonism, while adopting a more favorable attitude to nihilism.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Philosophia is a copyright of Springer, 2025. All Rights Reserved.
      item: Philosophia
      holder: Springer Nature
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2025
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N