Artificial Justice.
The article focuses on the critical examination of statistical algorithms and their implications for justice, as discussed in the book "Artificial Justice." The author, Tatiana Dancy, explores the potential for algorithmic injustice, emphasizing the importance of relevance, equality, and the value o...
| Published in: | Modern Law Review Vol. 88; no. 4; pp. 861 - 866 |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Article |
| Published: |
Wiley-Blackwell
Jul2025
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | View this record in EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=186459181&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 186459181 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00267961 D8H jtl: Modern Law Review issn: 00267961 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: Jul2025 vid: 88 iid: 4 pid: 480 pub: Wiley-Blackwell artinfo: ui: 186459181 10.1111/1468-2230.12961 ppf: 861 ppct: 5 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 70KB tig: atl: Artificial Justice. aug: au: Smuha, Nathalie A. su: Job applications Artificial intelligence Criminal evidence Self-fulfilling prophecy Justice sug: subj: Job applications Artificial intelligence Criminal evidence Self-fulfilling prophecy Justice ab: The article focuses on the critical examination of statistical algorithms and their implications for justice, as discussed in the book "Artificial Justice." The author, Tatiana Dancy, explores the potential for algorithmic injustice, emphasizing the importance of relevance, equality, and the value of choice in decision-making processes influenced by these algorithms. Dancy argues that while statistical algorithms can enhance decision-making accuracy, they also risk perpetuating biases and undermining individual autonomy if not designed and implemented thoughtfully. The book advocates for transparency and the need for human oversight in algorithmic processes, while also challenging traditional views on these solutions. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Modern Law Review is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Modern Law Review holder: Wiley-Blackwell dt: @attributes: year: 2025 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|