Personalities, Teachers and Curriculum Change.

This article informs that the prospect of the 1960s is one of great significance for American education. A resurgence of public awareness of education and insistence on improvement in its quality is bringing about a reexamination of the organization and content of the school curriculum. In recent ye...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Educational Leadership Vol. 21; no. 2; pp. 107 - 112
Autores principales: Urick, Ronald, Frymier, Jack R.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Association for Supervision & Curriculum Development Nov1963
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=18647275&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 18647275
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00131784
        EDL
      jtl: Educational Leadership
      issn: 00131784
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Nov1963
      vid: 21
      iid: 2
      pid: 69
      pub: Association for Supervision & Curriculum Development
    artinfo:
      ui: 18647275
      ppf: 107
      ppct: 5
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Personalities, Teachers and Curriculum Change.
      aug:
        au:
          Urick, Ronald
          Frymier, Jack R.
        affil:
          Instructor, College of Education, Ohio State University, Columbus.
          Associate Professor, College of Education, Ohio State University, Columbus.
      su:
        Curriculum change
        Curriculum planning
        Curriculum
        Teachers
        School districts
        Teaching
      sug:
        subj:
          Curriculum change
          Curriculum planning
          Curriculum
          Teachers
          School districts
          Teaching
      ab: This article informs that the prospect of the 1960s is one of great significance for American education. A resurgence of public awareness of education and insistence on improvement in its quality is bringing about a reexamination of the organization and content of the school curriculum. In recent years national committees of eminent scientists have developed high school science and mathematics programs which have been widely adopted in the schools. An ineffective teacher will not suddenly become effective with the adoption of new curricular materials. If instruction is to be improved, it must be through developments within each school district, in each building, and within each classroom. The existence of ill-defined relationships among teachers, administrators and supervisors and of conflicting perceptions of the role each sees himself and others playing may combine to inhibit the consideration of change, and may, therefore, have a negative effect on teachers' attitudes.
      pubtype: Periodical
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 1963
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N