Close encounters: Interpersonal proximity amplifies social appraisals.

Social appraisals reflect the rapid integration of available perceptual information with broader contextual factors (e.g., intentions). While interpersonal distance affects both information availability and social context, how it changes trait impressions remains unknown. Over four experiments, we u...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:British Journal of Psychology Vol. 116; no. 3; pp. 594 - 617
Main Authors: Veranic, Kristina, Bayliss, Andrew P., Zhao, Mintao, Stephen, Ian D., Ewing, Louise
Format: Article
Published: Wiley-Blackwell Aug2025
Subjects:
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=186621257&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 186621257
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00071269
        BJP
      jtl: British Journal of Psychology
      issn: 00071269
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Aug2025
      vid: 116
      iid: 3
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
    artinfo:
      ui:
        186621257
        10.1111/bjop.12781
      ppf: 594
      ppct: 23
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: C
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 1.1MB
      tig:
        atl: Close encounters: Interpersonal proximity amplifies social appraisals.
      aug:
        au:
          Veranic, Kristina
          Bayliss, Andrew P.
          Zhao, Mintao
          Stephen, Ian D.
          Ewing, Louise
        affil:
          University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
          Bournemouth University, Poole, UK
      su:
        Aesthetics
        Social perception
        Body image
        Analysis of variance
        Trust
        Judgment (Psychology)
        Interpersonal relations
        Statistical models
        Scale analysis (Psychology)
        Research funding
        Prompts (Psychology)
        T-test (Statistics)
        Data analysis
        Descriptive statistics
        Experimental design
        Intention
        Statistics
        Confidence intervals
        Data analysis software
        Face perception
      sug:
        subj:
          Aesthetics
          Social perception
          Body image
          Analysis of variance
          Trust
          Judgment (Psychology)
          Interpersonal relations
          Statistical models
          Scale analysis (Psychology)
          Research funding
          Prompts (Psychology)
          T-test (Statistics)
          Data analysis
          Descriptive statistics
          Experimental design
          Intention
          Statistics
          Confidence intervals
          Data analysis software
          Face perception
      keyword:
        body perception
        face perception
        interpersonal distance
        person perception
        trait attribution
        body perception
        face perception
        interpersonal distance
        person perception
        trait attribution
      ab: Social appraisals reflect the rapid integration of available perceptual information with broader contextual factors (e.g., intentions). While interpersonal distance affects both information availability and social context, how it changes trait impressions remains unknown. Over four experiments, we used a novel paradigm to address this question. In Experiment 1, we assessed participants' attributions of attractiveness, competence, dominance and trustworthiness of life size full body images of people when they appeared at near (1 m) and far (4 m) distances. Proximity amplified the relative magnitude of both positive and negative socio‐evaluative impressions. However, this effect of proximity leading to more extreme positive or negative ratings was selectively weaker for aesthetic (attractiveness) judgements. In Experiment 2 (size) and Experiment 3 (spatial frequency), we held distance constant while manipulating visual cues relating to implied distance, revealing broadly similar results to Experiment 1. In Experiment 4, we used the interpersonal comfort distance paradigm to confirm that our life‐sized projected images elicited similar comfort distance to interacting with a real person, helping to validate our general approach. These findings demonstrate the crucial role of interpersonal distance in impression judgements.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N