New frame for an old issue: How organizations view frame choice, embedding, and efficacy about child, early, and forced marriage.
What leads those working on the front lines of a problem to adopt a particular advocacy frame? How does a frame of an issue or problem affect the day-to-day work of nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) and advocates? Focusing on framing regarding child, early, and forced marriage (CEFM), we build a...
| Publicado en: | Journal of Human Rights Vol. 24; no. 3; pp. 277 - 296 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , , , |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Jul/Aug2025
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=186641556&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 186641556 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 14754835 J49 jtl: Journal of Human Rights issn: 14754835 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Jul/Aug2025 vid: 24 iid: 3 pid: 377 pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd artinfo: ui: 186641556 10.1080/14754835.2025.2507590 ppf: 277 ppct: 19 formats: tig: atl: New frame for an old issue: How organizations view frame choice, embedding, and efficacy about child, early, and forced marriage. aug: au: Murdie, Amanda Calhoun, Morgan Park, Baekkwan Hart, Jacqueline Mullinax, Margo affil: University of Georgia University of Missouri Feminist Humanitarian Network American Jewish World Service su: Forced marriage Nongovernmental organizations Decision making Frames (Social sciences) Continuous processing sug: subj: Forced marriage Nongovernmental organizations Decision making Frames (Social sciences) Continuous processing ab: What leads those working on the front lines of a problem to adopt a particular advocacy frame? How does a frame of an issue or problem affect the day-to-day work of nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) and advocates? Focusing on framing regarding child, early, and forced marriage (CEFM), we build a unique argument that examines both frame change and frame embedding within advocacy organizations. Frame adoption is not a dichotomous decision but a continuous process, with varying degrees to which a frame can be identified with, adopted, and embedded into an organization. Our argument suggests that the degree of frame embedding cannot come strictly from above or outside the organization; work by donors and outside actors may be able to encourage lip-service to a new frame but will not, on their own, lead to the full adoption and embedding of a frame in a way that is critical for problem-solving. We test the implications of our argument using a new dataset based on the responses of 1,118 global advocates working on CEFM. Our project is not only the first large-scale survey of CEFM advocates but also one of the first large-scale surveys of advocates and NGOs in general. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|