Enhanced accuracy and stability in automated intra-pancreatic fat deposition monitoring of type 2 diabetes mellitus using Dixon MRI and deep learning.

Purpose: Intra-pancreatic fat deposition (IPFD) is closely associated with the onset and progression of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). We aimed to develop an accurate and automated method for assessing IPFD on multi-echo Dixon MRI. Materials and methods: In this retrospective study, 534 patients f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Abdominal Radiology Vol. 50; no. 8; pp. 3685 - 3698
Autores principales: Pan, Zhongxian, Chen, Qiuyi, Lin, Haiwei, Huang, Wensheng, Li, Junfeng, Meng, Fanqi, Zhong, Zhangnan, Liu, Wenxi, Li, Zhujing, Qin, Haodong, Huang, Bingsheng, Chen, Yueyao
Formato: Journal Article
Publicado: Springer Nature Aug2025
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
Descripción
Sumario:Purpose: Intra-pancreatic fat deposition (IPFD) is closely associated with the onset and progression of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). We aimed to develop an accurate and automated method for assessing IPFD on multi-echo Dixon MRI. Materials and methods: In this retrospective study, 534 patients from two centers who underwent upper abdomen MRI and completed multi-echo and double-echo Dixon MRI were included. A pancreatic segmentation model was trained on double-echo Dixon water images using nnU-Net. Predicted masks were registered to the proton density fat fraction (PDFF) maps of the multi-echo Dixon sequence. Deep semantic segmentation feature-based radiomics (DSFR) and radiomics features were separately extracted on the PDFF maps and modeled using the support vector machine method with 5-fold cross-validation. The first deep learning radiomics (DLR) model was constructed to distinguish T2DM from non-diabetes and pre-diabetes by averaging the output scores of the DSFR and radiomics models. The second DLR model was then developed to distinguish pre-diabetes from non-diabetes. Two radiologist models were constructed based on the mean PDFF of three pancreatic regions of interest. Results: The mean Dice similarity coefficient for pancreas segmentation was 0.958 in the total test cohort. The AUCs of the DLR and two radiologist models in distinguishing T2DM from non-diabetes and pre-diabetes were 0.868, 0.760, and 0.782 in the training cohort, and 0.741, 0.724, and 0.653 in the external test cohort, respectively. For distinguishing pre-diabetes from non-diabetes, the AUCs were 0.881, 0.688, and 0.688 in the training cohort, which included data combined from both centers. Testing was not conducted due to limited pre-diabetic patients. Intraclass correlation coefficients between radiologists' pancreatic PDFF measurements were 0.800 and 0.699 at two centers, suggesting good and moderate reproducibility, respectively. Conclusion: The DLR model demonstrated superior performance over radiologists, providing a more efficient, accurate and stable method for monitoring IPFD and predicting the risk of T2DM and pre-diabetes. This enables IPFD assessment to potentially serve as an early biomarker for T2DM, providing richer clinical information for disease progression and management.