Is there a tension between AI safety and AI welfare?

The field of AI safety considers whether and how AI development can be safe and beneficial for humans and other animals, and the field of AI welfare considers whether and how AI development can be safe and beneficial for AI systems. There is a prima facie tension between these projects, since some m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Philosophical Studies Vol. 182; no. 7; pp. 2005 - 2034
Autores principales: Long, Robert, Sebo, Jeff, Sims, Toni
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Springer Nature Jul2025
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
Descripción
Sumario:The field of AI safety considers whether and how AI development can be safe and beneficial for humans and other animals, and the field of AI welfare considers whether and how AI development can be safe and beneficial for AI systems. There is a prima facie tension between these projects, since some measures in AI safety, if deployed against humans and other animals, would raise questions about the ethics of constraint, deception, surveillance, alteration, suffering, death, disenfranchisement, and more. Is there in fact a tension between these projects? We argue that, considering all relevant factors, there is indeed a moderately strong tension—and it deserves more examination. In particular, we should devise interventions that can promote both safety and welfare where possible, and prepare frameworks for navigating any remaining tensions thoughtfully.