Properties of Measurements of Patient‐Reported Outcome Measures Physical Activity Assessment in Chronic Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review.

Background and Purpose: The assessment of physical activity (PA) using Patient‐Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) is routine due to its easy applicability and low cost. In the context of CKD, there are several studies that evaluate PA through PROM, but there is heterogeneity in the choice of tool. Th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Physiotherapy Research International Vol. 30; no. 3; pp. 1 - 16
Autores principales: Stella, Thamiê Cristina, Santos, Inaê Silva, Alves da Silva, Graziella, Gomes, Cid André, Malosá Sampaio, Luciana Maria
Formato: research systematic review tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Jul2025
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=186954775&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 186954775
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        13582267
        GPG
      jtl: Physiotherapy Research International
      issn: 13582267
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jul2025
      vid: 30
      iid: 3
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
      place: Malden, Massachusetts
    artinfo:
      ui:
        186954775
        186954775
        186954775
        10.1002/pri.70076
        186954775
      ppf: 1
      ppct: 15
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: C
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: Properties of Measurements of Patient‐Reported Outcome Measures Physical Activity Assessment in Chronic Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review.
      aug:
        au:
          Stella, Thamiê Cristina
          Santos, Inaê Silva
          Alves da Silva, Graziella
          Gomes, Cid André
          Malosá Sampaio, Luciana Maria
        affil: Postgraduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences, Universidade Nove de Julho, São Paulo, Brazil
      sug:
        subj:
          Renal Insufficiency, Chronic Rehabilitation
          Physical Activity Evaluation
          Patient-Reported Outcomes Utilization
          Questionnaires Utilization
          Psychometrics Evaluation
          Human
          Systematic Review
          PubMed
          Medline
          Embase
          Checklists
          Patient Attitudes
          Descriptive Statistics
          Physical Therapy Practice
          Funding Source
      ab: Background and Purpose: The assessment of physical activity (PA) using Patient‐Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) is routine due to its easy applicability and low cost. In the context of CKD, there are several studies that evaluate PA through PROM, but there is heterogeneity in the choice of tool. Therefore, the objective of this study was to identify, evaluate and synthesize the psychometric properties of PROMs used in the assessment of PA in CKD. Methods: A systematic review was carried out according to the PRISMA guidelines in PubMed, SciELO, Medline, Lilacs and EMBASE databases. The assessment of the quality of the studies was evaluated using the COSMIN Checklist and EMPRO tool. Results: 15,137 studies were found, with 17 included. Eleven PROMs were found, of which 2 were elaborate to the CKD population: Chronic Kidney Disease Physical Activity Questionnaire (CKD‐PAQ) and Low Physical Activity Questionnaire (LoPAQ). Criterion validity was the most evaluated psychometric property. Only CKD‐PAQ shows satisfactory results in both evaluation tools for the psychometric properties evaluated. Discussion: This systematic review found no consensus in the literature for the best PROM for assessing PA in CKD. However, the CKD‐PAQ appears to be promising as the only PROM with a favorable evaluation by both COSMIN RoB and EMPRO. There is a lack of studies evaluating PA in the early stages of CKD and its responsiveness, indicating a gap in the research. COSMIN RoB and EMPRO differed from each other, showing that the choice of the evaluation tool must be guided by the evaluator's expertise and objective. Trial Registration: Systematic review registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022312143)
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        systematic review
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N