Moderate Physical Perspectivalism.

Recent developments in the foundations of physics have given rise to a class of views suggesting that physically meaningful descriptions must always be relativized to a physical perspective. In this article, I distinguish between strong physical perspectivalism, which maintains that all facts must b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Philosophy of Science Vol. 92; no. 3; pp. 624 - 646
Autor principal: Adlam, Emily
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Cambridge University Press Jul2025
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=187055229&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 187055229
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00318248
        PSC
      jtl: Philosophy of Science
      issn: 00318248
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jul2025
      vid: 92
      iid: 3
      pid: 15979
      pub: Cambridge University Press
    artinfo:
      ui:
        187055229
        10.1017/psa.2024.73
      ppf: 624
      ppct: 22
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 231KB
      tig:
        atl: Moderate Physical Perspectivalism.
      aug:
        au: Adlam, Emily
        affil: Philosophy Department and Institute for Quantum Studies, Chapman University, Orange, CA 92866, USA
      su:
        Humility
        Philosophy of science
        Empirical research
        Scientific community
        Phenomenology
      sug:
        subj:
          Humility
          Philosophy of science
          Empirical research
          Scientific community
          Phenomenology
      ab: Recent developments in the foundations of physics have given rise to a class of views suggesting that physically meaningful descriptions must always be relativized to a physical perspective. In this article, I distinguish between strong physical perspectivalism, which maintains that all facts must be relativized to a perspective, and moderate physical perspectivalism, which maintains that all empirically meaningful descriptions must be relativized to a perspective. I argue that scientific evidence and philosophical considerations support moderate physical perspectivalism over strong physical perspectivalism. In particular, motivations connected to epistemic humility and the social nature of science are more compatible with the moderate approach.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Philosophy of Science is the property of Cambridge University Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Philosophy of Science
      holder: Cambridge University Press
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2025
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N