Training Intensity Needed for Volume Linearity and Syringe DLCO Check Quality Control.

Background: Technologists must assure the accuracy and precision of pulmonary function equipment prior to testing patients. This study aimed to identify the sources of failure and unacceptable submission rates for spirometry volume linearity and syringe diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon mono...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Respiratory Care Vol. 70; no. 8; pp. 1005 - 1013
Autores principales: Becker, Ellen A., Moran, Ellen M., Blonshine, Jason B., Rodriguez, Vanessa I., Blonshine, Susan B.
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. Aug2025
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=187150239&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 187150239
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00201324
        4GG
      jtl: Respiratory Care
      issn: 00201324
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Aug2025
      vid: 70
      iid: 8
      pid: 1365
      pub: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.
      place: New Rochelle, New York
    artinfo:
      ui:
        187150239
        187150239
        187150239
        10.1089/respcare.12565
        187150239
      ppf: 1005
      ppct: 8
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: Training Intensity Needed for Volume Linearity and Syringe DLCO Check Quality Control.
      aug:
        au:
          Becker, Ellen A.
          Moran, Ellen M.
          Blonshine, Jason B.
          Rodriguez, Vanessa I.
          Blonshine, Susan B.
        affil: Dr. Becker is affiliated with Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
      sug:
        subj:
          Spirometry Equipment and Supplies
          Equipment Reliability
          Respiratory Therapy Equipment and Supplies Evaluation
          Quality Assurance
          Medical Technologists Education
          Respiratory Therapy
          Human
          Male
          Female
          Cross Sectional Studies
          Descriptive Statistics
          Spearman's Rank Correlation Coefficient
          Data Analysis Software
          Treatment Errors
          Task Performance and Analysis
          Male
          Female
      ab: Background: Technologists must assure the accuracy and precision of pulmonary function equipment prior to testing patients. This study aimed to identify the sources of failure and unacceptable submission rates for spirometry volume linearity and syringe diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) check quality control (QC). In addition, we explored whether the time between training and first QC submission affected overall percentage of unacceptable submissions. Methods: Participants in a cross-sectional global study submitted QC for evaluation from October 2014 to May 2018 from 114 laboratories. Descriptive statistics summarized the percentage of unacceptable submissions and sources of failure for volume linearity and syringe DLCO check maneuvers. Spearman's rho described the correlation between site-specific unacceptable submission rates, and both days between training and the first unacceptable submission and the days between training and first submission. Results: The unacceptable submission rate from 5,083 volume linearity assessments was 10% compared with a 6.2% rate from 4,992 syringe DLCO check maneuvers. Aggregate volume linearity rates of procedural errors (5.8%) and equipment errors (6.2%) were similar, whereas there were more syringe DLCO check equipment errors (5.9%) than procedural errors (0.78%). The time between training and submitting a QC test was not related to overall unacceptable submission rates for volume linearity and syringe DLCO check, rsp = 0.11, P =.27 and rsp = 0.19, P =.052, respectively. Higher unacceptable rates occurred when the first QC failure occurred close to the completion of training for volume linearity and syringe DLCO check, rsp = −0.41, P <.001 and rsp = −0.38, P <.001, respectively. Conclusions: A single QC training session does not adequately prepare technologists to conduct QC. Technologists need clear and consistent guidelines for conducting QC procedures and regular follow-up from experts to properly interpret QC findings, resolve equipment problems, and assure their testing systems are in-control.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N