Fibrosis‐Guided Ablation in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Meta‐Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Ablation of fibrotic atrial regions has been suggested to improve the results of atrial fibrillation (AF) catheter ablation. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of fibrosis‐guided ablation in addition to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) among AF patients undergoing ablation through a systemat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology Vol. 36; no. 8; pp. 2025 - 2041
Autores principales: Salih, Ahmed, Sutaria, Aman, Montaser, Zeinab, Magar, Tony Pun, El Ashal, Gehad, Zaghloul, Sheref, Tom, Alen Jiji, Ahmad, Mahmood, Creta, Antonio, Ali, Hussam, Barra, Sergio, Farkowski, Michal, Cappato, Riccardo, Providencia, Rui
Formato: meta analysis research systematic review tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Aug2025
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=187392135&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 187392135
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        10453873
        GSB
      jtl: Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology
      issn: 10453873
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Aug2025
      vid: 36
      iid: 8
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
      place: Malden, Massachusetts
    artinfo:
      ui:
        187392135
        185677268
        187392135
        187392135
        10.1111/jce.16723
        187392135
      ppf: 2025
      ppct: 16
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: C
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: Fibrosis‐Guided Ablation in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Meta‐Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
      aug:
        au:
          Salih, Ahmed
          Sutaria, Aman
          Montaser, Zeinab
          Magar, Tony Pun
          El Ashal, Gehad
          Zaghloul, Sheref
          Tom, Alen Jiji
          Ahmad, Mahmood
          Creta, Antonio
          Ali, Hussam
          Barra, Sergio
          Farkowski, Michal
          Cappato, Riccardo
          Providencia, Rui
        affil: School of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
      sug:
        subj:
          Atrial Fibrillation Therapy
          Radiofrequency Ablation
          Catheter Ablation
          Pulmonary Veins Surgery
          Patient Safety Evaluation
          Treatment Outcomes Evaluation
          Human
          Systematic Review
          Meta Analysis
          Embase
          Medline
          Confidence Intervals
          Descriptive Statistics
          Body Surface Potential Mapping Methods
          Randomized Controlled Trials
          Funding Source
      ab: Ablation of fibrotic atrial regions has been suggested to improve the results of atrial fibrillation (AF) catheter ablation. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of fibrosis‐guided ablation in addition to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) among AF patients undergoing ablation through a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. The review protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42024561077). Database searches were conducted on EMBASE and MEDLINE until 6th September 2024. Freedom from atrial arrhythmia (including AF and/or atrial tachycardia) and periprocedural complications were the main outcomes. Twelve trials (total of 3,066 patients) were included in the analysis. Ten studies utilized three‐dimensional electroanatomic voltage mapping, and two used magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to map atrial fibrosis. Compared to PVI, adjunctive fibrosis‐guided ablation significantly improved freedom from atrial arrhythmia (risk ratio [RR] 1.13; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04 − 1.23; p = 0.004; I² = 35%). This benefit was seen in persistent AF (RR 1.13; 95% CI 1.01 − 1.25; p = 0.03), but not paroxysmal AF (RR 1.16; 95% CI 0.83 − 1.61; p = 0.20). Only low‐voltage area ablation showed improved freedom from atrial arrhythmias (RR 1.17; 95% CI 1.06 − 1.28 vs. RR 1.03; 95% CI 0.80 − 1.32 using MRI‐voltage detection). A numerically, but nonsignificant, higher rate of periprocedural complications was observed with fibrosis‐guided ablation (4.4% vs. 2.8%; RR 1.44; 95% CI 0.82–2.56; p = 0.18) driven by the results of the DECAAF‐II trial. Fibrosis‐guided ablation, targeting low‐voltage areas on electroanatomic mapping, may be an effective adjunctive target to PVI for improving AF freedom, particularly for persistent AF. However, this approach poses safety concerns.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        meta analysis
        research
        systematic review
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N