Contemporary clinical conversations about stuttering: Can intervention stop early stuttering development?
Purpose: To discuss whether early intervention can stop stuttering development. To inform junior clinicians and students of speech-language pathology about contemporary views on this issue. Method: The issue was discussed by two university researchers and two speech-language pathologists who provide...
| Published in: | International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology Vol. 27; no. 4; pp. 539 - 547 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Published: |
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Aug2025
|
| Online Access: | View this record in EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=187499185&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 187499185 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 17549507 8NBH jtl: International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology issn: 17549507 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: Aug2025 vid: 27 iid: 4 pid: 377 pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd place: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania artinfo: ui: 187499185 179347335 187499185 187499185 10.1080/17549507.2024.2371870 187499185 ppf: 539 ppct: 8 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P tig: atl: Contemporary clinical conversations about stuttering: Can intervention stop early stuttering development? aug: au: L. Edwards, Brooke Jackson, Eric S. Kefalianos, Elaina Sheedy, Stacey Onslow, Mark affil: SAY: The Stuttering Association for the Young, New York, NY, USA sug: subj: Conversation Fluency Disorders Prevention and Control Early Intervention Health Personnel Students, Speech-Language Pathology Research Personnel Speech-Language Pathologists Reflection Professional Practice, Evidence-Based Severity of Illness Communication Fluency Disorders Classification ab: Purpose: To discuss whether early intervention can stop stuttering development. To inform junior clinicians and students of speech-language pathology about contemporary views on this issue. Method: The issue was discussed by two university researchers and two speech-language pathologists who provide public clinical services. Written conversational turns in an exchange were limited to 100 words each. When that written dialogue was concluded, each participant provided 200 words of final reflection about the issue. Result: Most differences that emerged centred on the clinical evidence base for early intervention, which emphasises stuttering reduction, and how it should be interpreted. Conclusion: The evidence base for early intervention has limitations and it should be interpreted cautiously. One interpretation is that reducing stuttering severity is a justifiable core of early management. Another interpretation focuses on ease of communication, anticipation of stuttering, and covert stuttering. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|