The Terminologies of the Papuan Tip Cluster of Languages in Comparative Austronesian Perspective.
This paper carries forward the comparative study of patterning in Austronesian relationship terminologies. Its strategic focus is on a specific region with societies whose languages are classified as belonging to the Papuan Tip Cluster. The paper examines the defining patterning of ten separate but...
| Publicado en: | Oceania Vol. 95; no. 2; pp. 110 - 129 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Wiley-Blackwell
Jul2025
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=187572491&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 187572491 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00298077 OCA jtl: Oceania issn: 00298077 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: Jul2025 vid: 95 iid: 2 pid: 480 pub: Wiley-Blackwell artinfo: ui: 187572491 10.1002/ocea.70010 ppf: 110 ppct: 19 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: C – @attributes: type: P size: 345KB tig: atl: The Terminologies of the Papuan Tip Cluster of Languages in Comparative Austronesian Perspective. aug: au: Fox, James J. affil: The Australian National University su: Language & languages Kinship Comparative studies Pattern perception Research methodology sug: subj: Language & languages Kinship Comparative studies Pattern perception Research methodology keyword: Austronesian kinship Austronesian linguistics comparative methodology Oceania Papuan Tip Cluster Austronesian kinship Austronesian linguistics comparative methodology Oceania Papuan Tip Cluster ab: This paper carries forward the comparative study of patterning in Austronesian relationship terminologies. Its strategic focus is on a specific region with societies whose languages are classified as belonging to the Papuan Tip Cluster. The paper examines the defining patterning of ten separate but related terminologies, tracing the distribution of these patterns from their likely area of origin within the Austronesian‐speaking world. The paper compares these terminologies according to a matrix of features that situates these terminologies within a wider Oceanic network. As a whole, it presents a methodology of possible relevance for significant categorical comparison of all Austronesian relationship terminologies. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|