MRI-derived deep learning models for predicting 1p/19q codeletion status in glioma patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies.

Purpose: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the performance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-derived deep learning (DL) models in predicting 1p/19q codeletion status in glioma patients. Methods: The literature search was performed in four databases: PubMed, Web of Scie...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Neuroradiology Vol. 67; no. 7; pp. 1667 - 1682
Main Authors: Ahmadzadeh, Amir Mahmoud, Broomand Lomer, Nima, Ashoobi, Mohammad Amin, Elyassirad, Danial, Gheiji, Benyamin, Vatanparast, Mahsa, Rostami, Amirhossein, Abouei Mehrizi, Mohammad Ali, Tabari, Azadeh, Bathla, Girish, Faghani, Shahriar
Format: meta analysis research systematic review tables/charts Journal Article
Published: Springer Nature Jul2025
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=187625127&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 187625127
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00283940
        NYZ
      jtl: Neuroradiology
      issn: 00283940
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jul2025
      vid: 67
      iid: 7
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
      place: New York, New York
    artinfo:
      ui:
        187625127
        185144814
        187625127
        187625127
        10.1007/s00234-025-03631-z
        187625127
      ppf: 1667
      ppct: 15
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: MRI-derived deep learning models for predicting 1p/19q codeletion status in glioma patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies.
      aug:
        au:
          Ahmadzadeh, Amir Mahmoud
          Broomand Lomer, Nima
          Ashoobi, Mohammad Amin
          Elyassirad, Danial
          Gheiji, Benyamin
          Vatanparast, Mahsa
          Rostami, Amirhossein
          Abouei Mehrizi, Mohammad Ali
          Tabari, Azadeh
          Bathla, Girish
          Faghani, Shahriar
        affil: https://ror.org/04sfka033 Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
      sug:
        subj:
          Magnetic Resonance Imaging
          Deep Learning
          Chromosome Aberrations
          Glioma
          Sensitivity and Specificity Evaluation
          Validity Evaluation
          Human
          Systematic Review
          Meta Analysis
          PubMed
          Embase
          Publication Bias Evaluation
          Confidence Intervals
          Probability
          Checklists
          Odds Ratio
          ROC Curve
      ab: Purpose: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the performance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-derived deep learning (DL) models in predicting 1p/19q codeletion status in glioma patients. Methods: The literature search was performed in four databases: PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Scopus. We included the studies that evaluated the performance of end-to-end DL models in predicting the status of glioma 1p/19q codeletion. The quality of the included studies was assessed by the Quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies-2 (QUADAS-2) METhodological RadiomICs Score (METRICS). We calculated diagnostic pooled estimates and heterogeneity was evaluated using I2. Subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis were conducted to explore sources of heterogeneity. Publication bias was evaluated by Deeks' funnel plots. Results: Twenty studies were included in the systematic review. Only two studies had a low quality. A meta-analysis of the ten studies demonstrated a pooled sensitivity of 0.77 (95% CI: 0.63–0.87), a specificity of 0.85 (95% CI: 0.74–0.92), a positive diagnostic likelihood ratio (DLR) of 5.34 (95% CI: 2.88–9.89), a negative DLR of 0.26 (95% CI: 0.16–0.45), a diagnostic odds ratio of 20.24 (95% CI: 8.19–50.02), and an area under the curve of 0.89 (95% CI: 0.86–0.91). The subgroup analysis identified a significant difference between groups depending on the segmentation method used. Conclusion: DL models can predict glioma 1p/19q codeletion status with high accuracy and may enhance non-invasive tumor characterization and aid in the selection of optimal therapeutic strategies.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        meta analysis
        research
        systematic review
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N