Effects of sample size information and within- and between-category similarity on study choices in self-regulated learning.

Category learning is usually better supported by interleaved training (alternating between exemplars from different categories) than by blocked training (studying all exemplars within a category sequentially), yet when asked to choose between the two strategies most people endorse blocking as superi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Memory & Cognition Vol. 53; no. 6; pp. 1767 - 1785
Autores principales: Han, Linzhu, Xie, Weiye, Li, Peijuan, Seger, Carol A., Liu, Zhiya
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Springer Nature Aug2025
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=187671950&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 187671950
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        0090502X
        MEG
      jtl: Memory & Cognition
      issn: 0090502X
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Aug2025
      vid: 53
      iid: 6
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
    artinfo:
      ui:
        187671950
        10.3758/s13421-025-01682-4
      ppf: 1767
      ppct: 18
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 1.3MB
      tig:
        atl: Effects of sample size information and within- and between-category similarity on study choices in self-regulated learning.
      aug:
        au:
          Han, Linzhu
          Xie, Weiye
          Li, Peijuan
          Seger, Carol A.
          Liu, Zhiya
        affil:
          https://ror.org/01kq0pv72 Center for the Study of Applied Psychology, Key Laboratory of Mental Health and Cognitive Science of Guangdong Province, School of Psychology, South China Normal University, 55 Zhongshan Avenue West, 510631, Guangzhou, P. R. China
          https://ror.org/03k1gpj17 Department of Psychology and Program in Molecular, Cellular, and Integrative Neurosciences, Colorado State University, 1876 Campus Delivery, 80523, Fort Collins, CO, USA
      su:
        Task performance
        Decision making
        Learning
        Self-control
        Goal (Psychology)
        Motivation (Psychology)
        Cognition
        Research funding
        Sample size (Statistics)
        Questionnaires
        Descriptive statistics
        Autodidacticism
        Experimental design
        Professional employee training
        Concepts
        Data analysis software
      sug:
        subj:
          Task performance
          Decision making
          Learning
          Self-control
          Goal (Psychology)
          Motivation (Psychology)
          Cognition
          Research funding
          Sample size (Statistics)
          Questionnaires
          Descriptive statistics
          Autodidacticism
          Experimental design
          Professional employee training
          Concepts
          Data analysis software
      keyword:
        Category learning
        Psychology and Cognitive Sciences Psychology
        Self-regulated learning
        Similarity
        Category learning
        Psychology and Cognitive Sciences Psychology
        Self-regulated learning
        Similarity
      ab: Category learning is usually better supported by interleaved training (alternating between exemplars from different categories) than by blocked training (studying all exemplars within a category sequentially), yet when asked to choose between the two strategies most people endorse blocking as superior. We used a prototype category-learning task to examine the effects of between- and within-category similarity and knowledge of the number of stimuli to be studied on study sequencing choices during self-regulated learning. Across three experiments (including a complete replication), participants who viewed the number of stimuli in each category showed more interleaving in comparison with those who did not, indicating that participants adjusted their strategy based on the projected length of the study phase. Participants informed about the number of stimuli also showed greater interleaving when within-category similarity was high and greater blocking when within-category similarity was low; this difference was not found when participants were not told the number of stimuli to be studied. Between-category similarity did not affect degree of blocking versus interleaving. Overall, interleaving decreased over training and blocking increased. Most participants endorsed hybrid strategies in which blocking was combined with at least some interleaving on a metacognitive questionnaire, but when forced to choose between exclusive blocking and exclusive interleaving, the majority endorsed blocking. These results indicate that participants are sensitive to category structure and expectations about task length when choosing stimuli to study during self-regulated learning, and adjust their strategy across the time course of study.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N