De‐municipalisation? Legacies of austerity for England's urban parks.

Parks are important urban infrastructures that contribute a broad range of health, environmental, social, and economic benefits. Despite this, UK parks' status as non‐statutory services makes them particularly vulnerable to local authority budget cuts. This paper focuses on parks in English cities a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Geographical Journal Vol. 191; no. 3; pp. 1 - 13
Autores principales: Smith, Andrew, Whitten, Meredith, Ernwein, Marion
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Sep2025
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=187692873&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 187692873
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00167398
        GEO
      jtl: Geographical Journal
      issn: 00167398
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Sep2025
      vid: 191
      iid: 3
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
    artinfo:
      ui:
        187692873
        10.1111/geoj.12518
      ppf: 1
      ppct: 12
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
              db: hlh
              ui: 187692873
          – @attributes:
              type: C
              db: hlh
              ui: 187692873
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              db: hlh
              ui: 187692873
      tig:
        atl: De‐municipalisation? Legacies of austerity for England's urban parks.
      aug:
        au:
          Smith, Andrew
          Whitten, Meredith
          Ernwein, Marion
        affil:
          School of Architecture and Cities, University of Westminster, London, UK
          Department of Geography and Environment, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
          Geography Department, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, The Open University, Milton Keynes, UK
      su:
        England
        Urban parks
        Cities & towns
        Local budgets
        Business revenue
        Budget cuts
      sug:
        subj:
          Urban parks
          Cities & towns
          England
          Local budgets
          Business revenue
          Budget cuts
      keyword:
        austerity
        cities
        governance
        green space
        parks
        austerity
        cities
        governance
        green space
        parks
      ab: Parks are important urban infrastructures that contribute a broad range of health, environmental, social, and economic benefits. Despite this, UK parks' status as non‐statutory services makes them particularly vulnerable to local authority budget cuts. This paper focuses on parks in English cities as these were particularly affected by severe cuts to local government budgets 2010–2019. This period of austerity affected parks provision in various ways, including service reductions, increased reliance on volunteer labour, and pressure to generate commercial revenue. Combined with a series of other factors, including ongoing neoliberalisation, austerity‐driven changes left a range of physical, social, and institutional legacies. This paper explores these using the notion of de‐municipalisation to frame the discussion. The paper is based on an innovative synthesis of research conducted by the authors 2016–2022 and presented at the RGS‐IBG Annual Conference in 2021. The paper identifies that austerity‐driven changes included an experimental 'shaking up' of park governance, away from local authorities and with greater involvement from national‐level NGOs. Changes also involved a 'breaking down' of municipal management, with responsibility delegated to dedicated parks trusts but also to community groups and volunteers. Ultimately, austerity 2010–2019 altered parks governance, transforming the stewardship and condition of parks, reducing accountability and accessibility, and exacerbating inequities in parks provision. Rather than representing new directions, these changes perpetuate those instigated in previous austerity eras. The noted trend towards de‐municipalisation also reduces parks' capacity to serve as integrated infrastructures – something that may hinder efforts to make cities more sustainable and resilient.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N