Effects of advice‐seeking patterns on community coalitions' outcomes: A social network analysis.

Community coalitions are well‐positioned to address local conditions affecting health. Coalitions rely on interactions among members to address community issues and plan for sustainability. Individuals and agencies participate voluntarily, and substantive decisions are generally made as a group. Hen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:American Journal of Community Psychology Vol. 76; pp. 177 - 188
Autores principales: Gaddy, Yvonne, Wells, Rebecca, Chilenski, Sarah M., Jones, Eric C., Brown, Louis D.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Sep2025
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=187693081&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 187693081
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00910562
        CMP
      jtl: American Journal of Community Psychology
      issn: 00910562
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Sep2025
      vid: 76
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
    artinfo:
      ui:
        187693081
        10.1002/ajcp.12808
      ppf: 177
      ppct: 11
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 1.1MB
      tig:
        atl: Effects of advice‐seeking patterns on community coalitions' outcomes: A social network analysis.
      aug:
        au:
          Gaddy, Yvonne
          Wells, Rebecca
          Chilenski, Sarah M.
          Jones, Eric C.
          Brown, Louis D.
        affil:
          Department of Health Promotion and Behavioral Sciences, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, School of Public Health, Houston Texas,, USA
          Department of Management, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, School of Public Health, Houston Texas,, USA
          Edna Bennett Pierce Prevention Research Center, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park Pennsylvania,, USA
          Department of Epidemiology, Human Genetics and Environmental Services, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, School of Public Health, Houston Texas,, USA
      su:
        Social network analysis
        Coalitions
        Group decision making
        Communication patterns
        Strategic planning
        Interdisciplinary research
        Regression analysis
      sug:
        subj:
          Social network analysis
          Coalitions
          Group decision making
          Communication patterns
          Strategic planning
          Interdisciplinary research
          Regression analysis
      keyword:
        advice‐seeking
        centralization
        community coalitions
        intersectoral communication
        social network analysis
        substance use
        advice‐seeking
        centralization
        community coalitions
        intersectoral communication
        social network analysis
        substance use
      ab: Community coalitions are well‐positioned to address local conditions affecting health. Coalitions rely on interactions among members to address community issues and plan for sustainability. Individuals and agencies participate voluntarily, and substantive decisions are generally made as a group. Hence, coalitions operate largely through advice rather than top‐down directives. This study examined whether advice‐seeking patterns within coalitions influenced members' perceptions of their collective outcomes. Indegree advice‐seeking is centered on consulting a few specialized sources and outdegree advice‐seeking draws upon a few people to reach out to numerous others. Surveys at two timepoints collected data from an unduplicated total of 1256 members of 62 coalitions in Pennsylvania and Missouri on their advice‐seeking ties, with responses aggregated to the coalition level. Regression analyses examined how coalition patterns of intersectoral communication and indegree and outdegree centralization, respectively, were associated with changes in perceived community improvement, sustainability planning, and coalition sustainability. Intersectoral communication was not related to coalition outcomes. Indegree advice‐seeking centralization was negatively associated with planning for coalition sustainability (B = −0.43, β = −0.22, 95% confidence interval [−0.84, −0.01], p <.05); and outdegree advice‐seeking centralization was negatively associated with coalition sustainability (B = −0.88, β = −0.31, 95% CI [−1.65, −0.10], p <.05). These findings suggest that decentralized advice‐seeking patterns foster coalition sustainability. Highlights: Used group effectiveness model to frame hypotheses on communication patterns in coalitions.Examined types of interactions among coalition members to seek advice.Tested hypotheses about coalitions' advice‐seeking patterns using social network analysis.Used regression models to test hypotheses on intersectoral communication and centralization.Showed the utility of network methods to analyze the effect of communication ties on coalition outcomes.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N