Mixing and matching: Intra‐stream interdependence in the multiple streams framework and the adoption of policy mixes.

Policy process literature offers several frameworks and theories to understand the adoption or modification of policies across different jurisdictions. Extant studies focus on the emergence of coalitions, actors, strategies, etc. as they relate to individual policies. Policy actions, however, are ty...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Policy Studies Journal Vol. 53; no. 3; pp. 580 - 604
Autores principales: Soni, Anmol, Mistur, Evan M.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Aug2025
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=187727039&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 187727039
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        0190292X
        PSJ
      jtl: Policy Studies Journal
      issn: 0190292X
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Aug2025
      vid: 53
      iid: 3
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
    artinfo:
      ui:
        187727039
        10.1111/psj.12582
      ppf: 580
      ppct: 24
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: C
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 931KB
      tig:
        atl: Mixing and matching: Intra‐stream interdependence in the multiple streams framework and the adoption of policy mixes.
      aug:
        au:
          Soni, Anmol
          Mistur, Evan M.
        affil:
          Department of Public Administration, E.J. Ourso College of Business, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge Louisiana,, USA
          Department of Public Affairs and Planning, College of Architecture, Planning and Public Affairs (CAPPA), The University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington Texas,, USA
      su:
        Coalitions
        Electric vehicle industry
        Fuzzy sets
        Measuring instruments
        Comparative studies
      sug:
        subj:
          Coalitions
          New and used automobile and light-duty truck merchant wholesalers
          New Car Dealers
          Automobile and Other Motor Vehicle Merchant Wholesalers
          Motor and Generator Manufacturing
          Automobile and light-duty motor vehicle manufacturing
          Automobile Manufacturing
          Motor Vehicle Body Manufacturing
          Other Electronic and Precision Equipment Repair and Maintenance
          Instruments and Related Products Manufacturing for Measuring, Displaying, and Controlling Industrial Process Variables
          Other Measuring and Controlling Device Manufacturing
          Electric vehicle industry
          Fuzzy sets
          Measuring instruments
          Comparative studies
      keyword:
        multiple streams
        policy design
        policy mix
        combinación de políticas
        diseño de políticas
        múltiples corrientes
        多源流,政策组合,政策设计
        multiple streams
        policy design
        policy mix
        combinación de políticas
        diseño de políticas
        múltiples corrientes
        多源流,政策组合,政策设计
      ab: Policy process literature offers several frameworks and theories to understand the adoption or modification of policies across different jurisdictions. Extant studies focus on the emergence of coalitions, actors, strategies, etc. as they relate to individual policies. Policy actions, however, are typically deployed as packages—combinations of different instruments or measures. Policy mixes—also used interchangeably with terms such as policy packaging, policy bundling, etc.—are an important aspect of policy design. However, the role and emergence of policy mixes in the context of the policy process have not been studied in great depth. This study examines the role of different policy pathways that yield desired policy outcomes in the electric vehicle (EV) policy subsystem. We use the case of sub‐national EV policies across the US to analyze how different combinations of policy actions operate in combination and/or competition with each other to achieve the desired policy objectives. The study contributes to the policy design scholarship in two ways. First, by analyzing the emergence of policy mixes as policy outputs during the policy design process using a theoretical lens applying the multiple streams framework. Second, by deploying fuzzy set Qualitative Comparative Analysis as a methodological tool to uncover causal pathways to desired policy outcomes.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N