A comparison between manual and automated event detection for shuffle, deceleration and run cut tasks using motion capture.

Increased adolescent sports participation lead to a rise in sports-related injuries. These injuries impact athletes' health and performance, necessitating improved injury prevention methods. The shuffle, deceleration, and run cut tasks are commonly used in injury prevention protocols to elicit impro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Clinical Biomechanics Vol. 129
Autores principales: Loewen, Alex M., Petric, Jan Karel, Olander, Hannah L., Riesenberg, Joshua, Ulman, Sophia
Formato: research Journal Article
Publicado: Elsevier B.V. Oct2025
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=187813423&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 187813423
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        02680033
        JB1
      jtl: Clinical Biomechanics
      issn: 02680033
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Oct2025
      vid: 129
      pid: 467
      pub: Elsevier B.V.
      place: New York, New York
    artinfo:
      ui:
        187813423
        187813423
        187813423
        10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2025.106644
        187813423
      ppct: 1
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: A comparison between manual and automated event detection for shuffle, deceleration and run cut tasks using motion capture.
      aug:
        au:
          Loewen, Alex M.
          Petric, Jan Karel
          Olander, Hannah L.
          Riesenberg, Joshua
          Ulman, Sophia
        affil: Scottish Rite for Children, Frisco, TX, USA
      sug:
        subj:
          Athletic Injuries Risk Factors
          Athletic Injuries Prevention and Control
          Motion Capture
          Running
          Detection Algorithms
          Task Performance and Analysis
          Human
          Male
          Female
          Adolescence
          Comparative Studies
          Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries
          Anterior Cruciate Ligament Surgery
          Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
          Athletic Injuries Physiopathology
          Imaging, Three-Dimensional
          Automation
          Biomechanics
          Movement
          Reproducibility of Results
          Sports Participation
          Athletic Performance
          Time Factors
          Intrarater Reliability
          Interrater Reliability
          Body Positions
          Descriptive Statistics
          Adolescent: 13-18 years
          Male
          Female
      ab: Increased adolescent sports participation lead to a rise in sports-related injuries. These injuries impact athletes' health and performance, necessitating improved injury prevention methods. The shuffle, deceleration, and run cut tasks are commonly used in injury prevention protocols to elicit improper movement mechanics. Recent literature examined the use of an automated event detection algorithm to improve the accuracy of 3-dimensional motion capture data processing techniques. Manual and automated event detection methods were compared during these tasks in two different groups of participants. Thirty healthy controls and thirty adolescents following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, performed a shuffle, deceleration, and run-cut task in a motion capture lab. Specific timepoints of the tasks were manually identified by two raters and automatically detected by custom MATLAB algorithms. Intra- and inter-rater reliability, differences in event timings, and task performance were compared. Significant differences in event timings were found between manual and automated methods, particularly with events identifying the lateral, forward, or vertical position of the participant with the absolute difference ranging from 4.7 to 13.5 frames across all three tasks. The identification of the first and last timepoints the foot is contacting the ground were similar between methods. The results of this study indicate that automated event detection is a more reliable method of identifying timepoints assessing participant's movement, highlighting its value in clinical and research settings. Automated event detection may improve injury risk assessments by minimizing user variability and offering consistent event identification across diverse movement tasks. • Automating event detection of injury risk assessment could improve accuracy. • The least agreement was between two raters during manual placement of the events. • The least agreement between raters was for events with no ground reaction force. • This discrepancy reveals the need for an automated event detection method.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N