Using formative evaluation to adapt a co-creation process within and between workplace contexts: A Health CASCADE study.
Co-creation offers a promising approach to developing tailored health promotion interventions, but it requires adaptable processes responsive to contextual needs. Formative evaluation supports this adaptability through continuous reflection and informed adaptations. This study examines adaptations t...
| Publicado en: | Public Health (Elsevier) Vol. 247 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , , , , |
| Formato: | research Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Elsevier B.V.
Oct2025
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=187866190&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 187866190 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 00333506 18J0 jtl: Public Health (Elsevier) issn: 00333506 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Oct2025 vid: 247 pid: 467 pub: Elsevier B.V. place: New York, New York artinfo: ui: 187866190 187866190 187866190 10.1016/j.puhe.2025.105853 187866190 ppct: 1 formats: tig: atl: Using formative evaluation to adapt a co-creation process within and between workplace contexts: A Health CASCADE study. aug: au: Vogelsang, Mira McCaffrey, Lauren Ryde, Gemma C. Verloigne, Maïté Delfmann, Lea Dall, Philippa M. affil: School of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Scotland, UK sug: subj: Program Evaluation Methods Implementation Science Methods Community Health Services Adaptation, Physiological Work Environment Learning Methods Process Assessment (Health Care) Human Qualitative Studies Action Research Public Health Feedback Health Promotion Documentation Thematic Analysis Descriptive Statistics ab: Co-creation offers a promising approach to developing tailored health promotion interventions, but it requires adaptable processes responsive to contextual needs. Formative evaluation supports this adaptability through continuous reflection and informed adaptations. This study examines adaptations through formative evaluation in co-creation processes within and between different workplace contexts to advance the evaluation, transferability, and public health impact of co-creation. A qualitative study examining adaptations to co-creation processes through thematic analysis. A co-creation process to develop a context-specific solution to reduce workplace sedentary behaviour was implemented in three small-to-medium-sized enterprises (6–8 sessions per company). Data from a pilot session, project meetings, co-creator feedback, and facilitator reflections were systematically linked to the resulting adaptations they informed. Reasons for adaptations were derived through thematic analysis. Adaptations occurred at two stages: planned adaptations, made before implementing the co-creation process, based on pilot data and project meeting logs, and responsive adaptations, made during implementation, informed by co-creator evaluations and facilitator reflections. Three main reasons for adaptations emerged: tailoring to context, enhancing process effectiveness, and fostering engagement. Formative evaluation is crucial in evaluating co-creation processes. It ensures that these processes remain relevant, effective, and engaging, with skilled facilitators and end-user input being key. Replicating co-creation processes in new contexts requires the documentation of previous adaptations to identify core elements while allowing flexibility. These insights support the design of adaptable, evidence-based co-creation processes and help advance their evaluation and implementation in diverse contexts to develop effective and tailored solutions. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: research Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|