God 2.0?
Robert L. Klitzman's Doctor, Will You Pray for Me? Medicine, Chaplains, and Healing the Whole Person (Oxford University Press, 2024) offers a fervent apology for the increasingly crucial role of chaplains in contemporary health care. It weaves together anthropological data from interviews with a cha...
| Publicado en: | Hastings Center Report Vol. 55; no. 4; pp. 41 - 44 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Wiley-Blackwell
Jul/Aug2025
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=187890763&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 187890763 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00930334 HCR jtl: Hastings Center Report issn: 00930334 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: Jul/Aug2025 vid: 55 iid: 4 pid: 480 pub: Wiley-Blackwell artinfo: ui: 187890763 10.1002/hast.70001 ppf: 41 ppct: 3 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 310KB tig: atl: God 2.0? aug: au: Lysaught, M. Therese su: Professional ethics Medical care Bioethics Religion Spirituality Computer assisted instruction Psychosocial factors Chaplains Information resources management sug: subj: Professional ethics Medical care Bioethics Religion Spirituality Computer assisted instruction Psychosocial factors Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences (except Biotechnology) All Other Information Services Chaplains Information resources management keyword: bioethics chaplaincy clinical ethics neoliberalism religion spirituality bioethics chaplaincy clinical ethics neoliberalism religion spirituality ab: Robert L. Klitzman's Doctor, Will You Pray for Me? Medicine, Chaplains, and Healing the Whole Person (Oxford University Press, 2024) offers a fervent apology for the increasingly crucial role of chaplains in contemporary health care. It weaves together anthropological data from interviews with a chaplain cohort, personal narrative, patient stories, chaplain testimony, and the social scientific study of religion. It also surfaces pointed questions about the assumptions that shape contemporary chaplaincy and the directions in which it is moving. These questions include the following: How might we clarify and strengthen the ambiguous and tensive relationship between chaplaincy and bioethics? How do we assess the normativity of the perduring Kantian/Jamesian account of religion and spirituality, which is highly individualized and emotivist? And in light of this, is chaplaincy simply becoming the institutionalized form of religion for twenty‐first‐century neoliberalized health care?. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|