Comparing Humeral Kinematic Variability During Farm Task Performance Between Laboratory and Field Agricultural Settings in Saskatchewan.

Objectives: Farmers experience high rates of shoulder injury, necessitating the need to better define the movement demands associated with farm work. Research is needed to determine whether simulating farm work in a laboratory environment will sufficiently capture the movement demands required in au...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Agromedicine Vol. 30; no. 4; pp. 681 - 692
Main Authors: Balogh, Denise, Sherlock, Loukas, Lang, Angelica E.
Format: pictorial research tables/charts Journal Article
Published: Taylor & Francis Ltd Oct2025
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=187949755&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 187949755
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        1059924X
        85S
      jtl: Journal of Agromedicine
      issn: 1059924X
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Oct2025
      vid: 30
      iid: 4
      pid: 377
      pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd
      place: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
    artinfo:
      ui:
        187949755
        187447002
        187949755
        187949755
        10.1080/1059924X.2025.2540579
        187949755
      ppf: 681
      ppct: 11
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Comparing Humeral Kinematic Variability During Farm Task Performance Between Laboratory and Field Agricultural Settings in Saskatchewan.
      aug:
        au:
          Balogh, Denise
          Sherlock, Loukas
          Lang, Angelica E.
        affil: Canadian Center for Rural and Agricultural Health, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada
      sug:
        subj:
          Agriculture Canada
          Task Performance and Analysis Evaluation
          Laboratories
          Environment, Controlled
          Humerus Physiology
          Kinematics
          Human
          Male
          Female
          Adult
          Middle Age
          Canada
          Farmworkers
          Comparative Studies
          Descriptive Statistics
          Physical Performance
          Stair Climbing
          Weight Lifting
          Age Factors
          Sex Factors
          Range of Motion
          One-Way Analysis of Variance
          Work Environment
          Occupational-Related Injuries Risk Factors
          Risk Assessment
          Questionnaires
          Funding Source
          Adult: 19-44 years
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
          Male
          Female
      ab: Objectives: Farmers experience high rates of shoulder injury, necessitating the need to better define the movement demands associated with farm work. Research is needed to determine whether simulating farm work in a laboratory environment will sufficiently capture the movement demands required in authentic agricultural environments. The purpose of this study was to compare variability in farm task performance between laboratory and field locations. Methods: Inertial measurement units tracked humeral kinematics during four simulated farming work tasks (overhead drill, shovel, climb ladder, seed bag lift) and in three different locations; the laboratory, an agricultural tradeshow ("Ag in Motion"), and individual authentic grain/cattle farms. Ten participants per location were sex and age matched. Mean and peak humeral elevation, mean axial rotation, and peak internal and external rotation joint angles were evaluated for the primary "mover" arm during each of the tasks. Within and between participant variability, as well as differences in task performance across locations were evaluated. Results: The within variability for peak humeral internal rotation during the shovel task was significantly lower in the laboratory compared to Ag in Motion and the farms (F2,27 = 5.59, p <.01, η2 = 0.29). However, within variability was comparable across locations for all other outcomes. Between participant variability was lowest in the laboratory in 12/20 outcomes, lowest at Ag in Motion in 7/20 outcomes, and lowest on the farms in only one outcome, suggesting lower between participant variability in the more highly controlled environments. Finally, significant differences in performance were elicited across locations for the overhead drill, shovel, and climb seeder tasks. Generally, lower humeral elevation and axial rotation occurred in the laboratory environment compared to Ag in Motion or the farms. Conclusion: Simulating an occupational task in the laboratory may not fully reflect the demands of the task when performed in real-world settings. While greater between participant variability may be unavoidable in-field due to differences in equipment and other environmental variables, the greater humeral elevation and axial rotation demands elicited in the field environments suggest in-field research is necessary to fully capture the complexity of occupational movements.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        pictorial
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N