Stopping an AI apocalypse.
The article critiques the arguments presented in the book *If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies* by Eliezer Yudkowsky and Nate Soares, which posits that superintelligent artificial intelligence (AI) could pose an existential threat to humanity. The author expresses skepticism about the authors' claims...
| Publicado en: | New Scientist Vol. 267; no. 3561; p. 31 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
New Scientist Ltd.
9/20/2025 Special Issue
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=188043227&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 188043227 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 02624079 NSI jtl: New Scientist issn: 02624079 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: 9/20/2025 Special Issue vid: 267 iid: 3561 pid: 39714 pub: New Scientist Ltd. artinfo: ui: 188043227 10.1016/s0262-4079(25)01544-1 188043227 ppf: 31 ppct: 0 formats: tig: atl: Stopping an AI apocalypse. aug: au: Aron, Jacob sug: ab: The article critiques the arguments presented in the book *If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies* by Eliezer Yudkowsky and Nate Soares, which posits that superintelligent artificial intelligence (AI) could pose an existential threat to humanity. The author expresses skepticism about the authors' claims regarding AI's potential motivations and the feasibility of their proposed policy measures, such as strict regulations on graphics processing units and extreme enforcement actions. The critique suggests that the focus on hypothetical AI dangers detracts from addressing pressing real-world issues like climate change, advocating for a more balanced perspective on current challenges rather than speculative fears about AI. pubtype: Review doctype: Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|