Controversies in the Management of Pilonidal Disease: Expert Recommendations from a Modified Delphi Survey and Review of the Literature.

Aim: This study aimed to identify key controversies in the management of pilonidal disease (PD) and to develop expert-based recommendations using a modified Delphi process, highlighting critical areas for future research. Method: A working group established by the Turkish Society of Colon and Rectal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Turkish Journal of Colorectal Disease Vol. 35; no. 3; pp. 79 - 93
Autores principales: Arslan, Çiğdem, Tatar, Cihad, Erol, Timuçin, Smeenk, Robert, Immerman, Steven, Wysocki, Peter, Toorenvliet, Boudewjin, Chiu, Bill, Yıldırım, Yasemin, Bişgin, Tayfun, Kozan, Ramazan, Maeda, Yasuko, Abbas, Maher A.
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Galenos Yayinevi Tic. LTD. STI Sep2025
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
Descripción
Sumario:Aim: This study aimed to identify key controversies in the management of pilonidal disease (PD) and to develop expert-based recommendations using a modified Delphi process, highlighting critical areas for future research. Method: A working group established by the Turkish Society of Colon and Rectal Surgery conducted a systematic literature review and invited national and international experts with relevant publication records to participate in a Delphi survey. A four-round Delphi process was conducted between July 2023 and February 2024. Statements that reached ≥70% consensus (agree/strongly agree) were accepted. Results: Of the 172 experts invited, 98 agreed to participate, and 52 completed at least two rounds. Expert opinions were evaluated across nine key aspects of PD management: classification, diagnosis, acute abscess, minimally invasive and excisional treatments, recurrence, hair removal, perioperative care, and postoperative management. Conclusion: This Delphi study presents expert consensus on unresolved clinical questions in the management of PD. The findings provide practical recommendations for surgeons and emphasize the need for prospective, high-quality studies to establish standardized treatment pathways.