Cover Image
QR Code

Fast prostate MRI vs. conventional multiparametric prostate MRI: comparison and outcomes.

Purpose: To assess the overall concordance of a fast prostate MRI (fpMRI) protocol versus conventional multiparametric prostate MRI (mpMRI) protocol. Methods: This is an IRB approved retrospective review of 100 men between the ages of 50 and 80 who underwent mpMRI exams from January 2016 to May 2021...

Full description

Published in:Abdominal Radiology Vol. 50; no. 10; pp. 4835 - 4844
Main Authors: Kordbacheh, Hamed, Ristic, Gorica, Heath, Elisabeth, Kim, Seongho, Raza, Kumayl, Heilbrun, Lance, Aoun, Hussein D
Format: Journal Article
Published: Springer Nature Oct2025
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=188150395&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 188150395
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        2366004X
        JT14
      jtl: Abdominal Radiology
      issn: 2366004X
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Oct2025
      vid: 50
      iid: 10
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
      place: New York, New York
    artinfo:
      ui:
        188150395
        184291055
        10.1007/s00261-025-04918-8
        188150395
      ppf: 4835
      ppct: 9
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: Fast prostate MRI vs. conventional multiparametric prostate MRI: comparison and outcomes.
      aug:
        au:
          Kordbacheh, Hamed
          Ristic, Gorica
          Heath, Elisabeth
          Kim, Seongho
          Raza, Kumayl
          Heilbrun, Lance
          Aoun, Hussein D
        affil: https://ror.org/00ee40h97 Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University, Detroit, USA
      sug:
      ab: Purpose: To assess the overall concordance of a fast prostate MRI (fpMRI) protocol versus conventional multiparametric prostate MRI (mpMRI) protocol. Methods: This is an IRB approved retrospective review of 100 men between the ages of 50 and 80 who underwent mpMRI exams from January 2016 to May 2021. The mpMRI exams selected came from three categories: Group A (PI-RADS 1–2); Group B (PI-RADS 3); and Group C (PI-RADS 4–5). Two masked radiologists independently reviewed and assigned each fpMRI case the highest possible lesion PI-RADS score. The collected fpMRI scores were then compared to the mpMRI results, PSA values, and available targeted biopsy outcomes. Results: The concordance rates between the two fpMRI reviewers and mpMRI for the individually assessed groups (A, B, C) were 0.69 (95% CI,0.62 to 0.75). The PPV of groups B or C combined for GS ≥ 7 for mpMRI, R1 fpMRI, and R2 fpMRI was 62% (40/64; 95% CI,0.50 to 0.74), 67% (40/60; 95% CI,0.53 to 0.78), and 72% (39/54; 95% CI,0.58 to 0.84), respectively. The negative predictive value (NPV) of group B or C combined for GS ≥ 7 on mpMRI, R1 fpMRI, and R2 fpMRI was 100% (3/3; 95% CI,29 to 100%), 100% (7/7; 95% CI,59 to 100%), and 92% (12/13; 95% CI,64 to 100%), respectively. Conclusions: The concordance rates, PPV and NPV between the mpMRI and fpMRI results for groups B and C were moderately high, moderately high, and very high, respectively. This pilot study suggests that a larger prospective study might be beneficial to help establish fpMRI as a screening tool for prostate cancer.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N