Infection prevention and control measures for multidrug-resistant organisms: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Background: The effectiveness of infection prevention and control measures combating multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) in healthcare settings remains controversial. Methods: PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and CINAHL were searched from inception to June 1, 2024. The interventions enco...
| Published in: | Infection Vol. 53; no. 5; pp. 1789 - 1801 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | research systematic review tables/charts Journal Article |
| Published: |
Springer Nature
Oct2025
|
| Online Access: | View this record in EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=188243058&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 188243058 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 03008126 NXO jtl: Infection issn: 03008126 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Oct2025 vid: 53 iid: 5 pid: 237 pub: Springer Nature place: New York, New York artinfo: ui: 188243058 183747179 188243058 188243058 10.1007/s15010-025-02498-9 188243058 ppf: 1789 ppct: 12 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P tig: atl: Infection prevention and control measures for multidrug-resistant organisms: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. aug: au: Geng, Yuhui Liu, Zhuo Ma, Xiaojuan Pan, Ting Chen, Mingbo Dang, Jingxia Zhang, Ping Chen, Chen Zhao, Yuan Pan, Dongfeng Liang, Peifeng affil: https://ror.org/02h8a1848 School of Public Health, Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, China sug: subj: Cross Infection Prevention and Control Drug Resistance, Microbial Drug Resistance, Multiple Infection Control Methods Hospitalization Intensive Care Units Health Facility Environment Human Funding Source Systematic Review PubMed Embase Medline Cochrane Library CINAHL Database Meta Analysis Descriptive Statistics Confidence Intervals Inpatients Handwashing Universal Precautions Bacterial Colonization Chlorhexidine Therapeutic Use Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae ab: Background: The effectiveness of infection prevention and control measures combating multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) in healthcare settings remains controversial. Methods: PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and CINAHL were searched from inception to June 1, 2024. The interventions encompassed standard precautions (SP), contact precautions (CP), hand hygiene (HH), environmental cleaning (ENV), antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASP), decolonization (DCL), and chlorhexidine baths (CHG). The primary outcome were the acquisition, infection, and colonization of MDROs. Secondary outcomes were all-cause mortality and MDROs-associated bacteraemia. Effect indicators were expressed as rate ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: The study included a total of 97 articles, comprising 19 RCTs and 78 non-RCTs. The results showed that the most effective combination interventions for the acquisition, infection, and colonization of MDROs compared to SP varied as follows: CP + CHG (RR, 0.38 [0.18, 0.79]), SP + CP + ENV (RR, 0.04 [0.02, 0.08]), and SP + CHG (RR, 0.28 [0.14, 0.56]). In subgroup analyses, CP + CHG (RR, 0.36 [0.20,0.64]) was the most effective intervention for the acquisition of MDROs in the ICU setting, whereas SP + CP + ASP (RR, 0.35 [0.14,0.92]) was the most effective hospital-wide. Across subgroups, SP + CP + ENV (RR, 0.04 to 0.09 [95% CI, 0.01 to 0.99]) was identified as the most effective intervention for MDROs infections. In the ICU setting, SP + CHG (RR, 0.28 [0.14,0.56]) demonstrated the highest effectiveness in reducing the colonization of MDROs, whereas SP + CP + ENV + CHG (RR, 0.15 [0.06,0.38]) was the most effective on a hospital-wide scale. SP + CP + DCL (RR, 0.28 [0.24, 0.32]) was associated with reduced CRE colonization. The results of this study were robust according to the sensitivity analysis. None of the analyses related to secondary outcomes were statistically significant. In terms of article quality assessment, 94.7% of the RCTs were medium to high risk, while 92.31% of the non-RCTs. The primary limitation of the RCTs were related to the randomization process, whereas the non-RCTs were primarily affected by confounding bias. Conclusions: Effective interventions differ based on carriage status, intervention setting, and the resistant strain. Additionally, contact precautions is a crucial component of these combinations. Consequently, healthcare organizations can select appropriate interventions based on their unique resistance profiles to optimize precision and resource efficiency. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: meta analysis research systematic review tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|