A Latent Class Analysis of COVID-19 Vaccine Attitudes and Beliefs: Results from a Community Survey Conducted Via the Chicagoland Community Engagement Alliance (CEAL) Program.

Background: In the U.S., responses to the rollout of COVID-19 vaccine varied widely, with contrasting perceptions of the vaccine. We aimed to characterize distinct groups of respondents regarding COVID-19 vaccine perceptions. Methods: Data came from the 2021–2023 Common Survey (n = 852), collected i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Community Health Vol. 50; no. 5; pp. 883 - 896
Autores principales: Vu, Milkie, Yeom, Jimin, Trinh, Duy, Gou, Jane, Hong, Timothy, Zaheeruddin, Marym, Bishop-Royse, Jessica, Hartstein, Madison, Spring, Bonnie, Moskowitz, David, Doan, Anh, Martin, Molly
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Springer Nature Oct2025
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=188314385&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 188314385
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00945145
        JCH
      jtl: Journal of Community Health
      issn: 00945145
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Oct2025
      vid: 50
      iid: 5
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
    artinfo:
      ui:
        188314385
        10.1007/s10900-025-01472-8
      ppf: 883
      ppct: 13
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 1.1MB
      tig:
        atl: A Latent Class Analysis of COVID-19 Vaccine Attitudes and Beliefs: Results from a Community Survey Conducted Via the Chicagoland Community Engagement Alliance (CEAL) Program.
      aug:
        au:
          Vu, Milkie
          Yeom, Jimin
          Trinh, Duy
          Gou, Jane
          Hong, Timothy
          Zaheeruddin, Marym
          Bishop-Royse, Jessica
          Hartstein, Madison
          Spring, Bonnie
          Moskowitz, David
          Doan, Anh
          Martin, Molly
        affil:
          https://ror.org/000e0be47 Department of Preventive Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, 680 N. Lakeshore Drive, Suite 1400, 60611, Chicago, IL, USA
          https://ror.org/00hx57361 School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton University, Robertson Hall, 08540, Princeton, NJ, USA
          https://ror.org/01j7c0b24 Rush University Medical Center, 600 S. Paulina St., Suite 1080, 60612, Chicago, IL, USA
          https://ror.org/000e0be47 Northwestern University Clinical and Translational Sciences (NUCATS) Institute, Feinberg School of Medicine, 750 N Lake Shore Drive, 11th Floor, 60611, Chicago, IL, USA
          https://ror.org/024mw5h28 Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland Ave MC2000, 60637, Chicago, IL, USA
          https://ror.org/02mpq6x41 Department of Pediatrics, University of Illinois at Chicago, 840 S. Wood St, 60612, Chicago, IL, USA
      su:
        Health attitudes
        Patient safety
        Vaccination
        Evaluation of human services programs
        Socioeconomic factors
        Communities
        Uncertainty
        Confidence
        Attitude (Psychology)
        Sociodemographic factors
        Public health
        Scale analysis (Psychology)
        Research funding
        Questionnaires
        Vaccine effectiveness
        Logistic regression analysis
        COVID-19 vaccines
        Structural equation modeling
        Odds ratio
        Data analysis software
        Confidence intervals
        COVID-19
      sug:
        subj:
          Health attitudes
          Patient safety
          Vaccination
          Evaluation of human services programs
          Socioeconomic factors
          Communities
          Uncertainty
          Confidence
          Attitude (Psychology)
          Sociodemographic factors
          Public health
          Health and Welfare Funds
          Administration of Public Health Programs
          Scale analysis (Psychology)
          Research funding
          Questionnaires
          Vaccine effectiveness
          Logistic regression analysis
          COVID-19 vaccines
          Structural equation modeling
          Odds ratio
          Data analysis software
          Confidence intervals
          COVID-19
      keyword:
        Community-engaged research
        COVID-19 vaccine
        Latent class analysis
        Medical and Health Sciences Public Health and Health Services
        Vaccine attitudes
        Vaccine perceptions
        Community-engaged research
        COVID-19 vaccine
        Latent class analysis
        Medical and Health Sciences Public Health and Health Services
        Vaccine attitudes
        Vaccine perceptions
      ab: Background: In the U.S., responses to the rollout of COVID-19 vaccine varied widely, with contrasting perceptions of the vaccine. We aimed to characterize distinct groups of respondents regarding COVID-19 vaccine perceptions. Methods: Data came from the 2021–2023 Common Survey (n = 852), collected in Chicago using a community-based participatory approach focusing on communities with low COVID-19 vaccination. Participants answered eight questions about vaccine-related perceptions. We conducted a latent class analysis in R. Results: The sample included 623 female participants (73.1%), 482 Black participants (56.6%), 259 Hispanic/Latino(a) participants (30.4%), 26 Asian participants (3.1%), and 261 participants with a college degree (30.6%). In a four-class model, Class 1 (skeptic) included 153 participants (18.0%) with low confidence in vaccine safety, effectiveness, and potential to get life back to normal. Class 2 (uncertain) included 163 participants (19.1%) who mostly indicated uncertainty. Class 3 (support with concerns) included 266 participants (31.2%) who recognized many vaccine benefits but also had concerns about its rapid development and "not being studied in people like me." Class 4 (pro-vaccine) included 270 participants (31.7%) with high confidence in vaccine safety and effectiveness and social approval of vaccination. Interestingly, both the skeptic and pro-vaccine groups had somewhat similar agreement with the statement "not enough information on COVID vaccine interaction." Class assignments varied by sociodemographic characteristics. Socioeconomic hardships were associated with a lower likelihood of being in the "pro-vaccine" group. Conclusions: Given the distinct classes of vaccine beliefs, tailored public health messaging is needed to enhance vaccine confidence and uptake.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N