Against book enclosures: Moving towards more diverse, humane and accessible book publishing.

Matthew Gandy's Commentary in Area (2023) criticised the decision of the national funder UKRI to mandate that all books resulting from the research that it funds must be published open access (OA) from 2024. This raises many issues of importance to geographers. We argue that scholars in the discipli...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Area (0004-0894) Vol. 57; no. 3; pp. 1 - 9
Autores principales: Batterbury, Simon P. J., Pia, Andrea E., Wielander, Gerda, Loubere, Nicholas
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Sep2025
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=188364309&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 188364309
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00040894
        D7Y
      jtl: Area (0004-0894)
      issn: 00040894
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Sep2025
      vid: 57
      iid: 3
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
    artinfo:
      ui:
        188364309
        10.1111/area.12916
      ppf: 1
      ppct: 8
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Against book enclosures: Moving towards more diverse, humane and accessible book publishing.
      aug:
        au:
          Batterbury, Simon P. J.
          Pia, Andrea E.
          Wielander, Gerda
          Loubere, Nicholas
        affil:
          SGEAS and Melbourne Climate Futures Academy, University of Melbourne, Melbourne Victoria,, Australia
          Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK
          Department of Anthropology, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
          Chinese Studies, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Westminster, London, UK
          Centre for East and South‐East Asian Studies, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
      su:
        United Kingdom
        Social justice
        Publishing
        Cost effectiveness
        Open access publishing
        Cultural geography
        Scholarly publishing
      sug:
        subj:
          Social justice
          Publishing
          Cost effectiveness
          United Kingdom
          Book Publishers
          Other publishers
          All Other Publishers
          Open access publishing
          Cultural geography
          Scholarly publishing
      keyword:
        geography
        Open Access publishing
        scholarly publishing
        social sciences and humanities
        UKRI
        geography
        Open Access publishing
        scholarly publishing
        social sciences and humanities
        UKRI
      ab: Matthew Gandy's Commentary in Area (2023) criticised the decision of the national funder UKRI to mandate that all books resulting from the research that it funds must be published open access (OA) from 2024. This raises many issues of importance to geographers. We argue that scholars in the discipline need to fight for affordable and ethically produced OA books, not 'legacy' modes of publishing. In particular, books produced by scholar‐led OA presses will not harm the reputation of departments or individual scholars, and they also have the potential to reduce significant financial barriers to accessing books across the globe. A more powerful critique must be to challenge the continued 'enclosure' of books, and the denial of OA by academic publishers and university presses. Mandated open access book publishing will not harm academic geography in the UK. It will increase readership, and hence the social justice of publishing, worldwide. Academic‐led book publishing is worthy of support.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N