Standing out or looking for cover? Strategies for defending public funding for the social sciences in the U.S.

• When arguing for public funding, US social scientists have stressed what they have in common with the natural sciences. • In one notable case, however, a number of social scientists argued for a new funding agency run by and for social scientists. • Congressional criticism and NSF leaders' skeptic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Studies in History & Philosophy of Science Part A Vol. 113; pp. 64 - 74
Autor principal: Hauptmann, Emily
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Elsevier B.V. Oct2025
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=188478336&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 188478336
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00393681
        HPS
      jtl: Studies in History & Philosophy of Science Part A
      issn: 00393681
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Oct2025
      vid: 113
      pid: 2410
      pub: Elsevier B.V.
    artinfo:
      ui:
        188478336
        10.1016/j.shpsa.2025.08.007
      ppf: 64
      ppct: 10
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Standing out or looking for cover? Strategies for defending public funding for the social sciences in the U.S.
      aug:
        au: Hauptmann, Emily
        affil: Western Michigan University, Department of Political Science, 1903 W Michigan Avenue, Kalamazoo, MI, 49008, USA
      su:
        Social scientists
        Government aid
        Political opposition
        Grants (Money)
        National Science Foundation (U.S.)
        Political science
        Resource allocation
        United States
      sug:
        subj:
          United States
          Social scientists
          Government aid
          Political opposition
          Grants (Money)
          National Science Foundation (U.S.)
          Political science
          Resource allocation
      ab: • When arguing for public funding, US social scientists have stressed what they have in common with the natural sciences. • In one notable case, however, a number of social scientists argued for a new funding agency run by and for social scientists. • Congressional criticism and NSF leaders' skepticism led to the 2019 cancellation of the NSF's political science program. • If the 2025 proposed cuts to the NSF happen, social scientists will have to design new strategies to argue for public funds.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2025
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N