Liar Sentence Mirroring Our Reasoning as Hegel's Quasi-Speculative Sentence.
This paper explores parallels between the Liar and various aspects of philosophical reasoning. It begins by analyzing the liar sentence, "This sentence is false", by highlighting its self-referential nature and alternating truth values. The paper then draws connections between the Liar and Hegel's s...
| Publicado en: | Problems / Problemos Vol. 107; pp. 23 - 40 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Vilnius University
2025
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=188541313&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 188541313 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 13921126 3D4C jtl: Problems / Problemos issn: 13921126 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: 2025 vid: 107 pid: 16037 pub: Vilnius University artinfo: ui: 188541313 10.15388/Problemos.2025.107.2 ppf: 23 ppct: 17 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 3.1MB tig: atl: Liar Sentence Mirroring Our Reasoning as Hegel's Quasi-Speculative Sentence. aug: au: Jae Jeong Lee affil: Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, South Korea su: Paradox Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich, 1770-1831 Zeno's paradoxes Logic Realism Critical analysis Epistemics sug: subj: Paradox Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich, 1770-1831 Zeno's paradoxes Logic Realism Critical analysis Epistemics keyword: determinism dialectics liar paradox logocentric predicament speculative sentence determinizmas dialektika logocentrizmo problema melagio paradoksas spekuliatyvus teiginys ab: This paper explores parallels between the Liar and various aspects of philosophical reasoning. It begins by analyzing the liar sentence, "This sentence is false", by highlighting its self-referential nature and alternating truth values. The paper then draws connections between the Liar and Hegel's speculative sentence, proposing it as a 'quasi-speculative sentence' that mirrors dialectical reasoning. Subsequent sections examine the logocentric predicament, Zeno's paradox, the realism vs. anti-realism debate, and determinism, illustrating how they embody similar self-negating structures. The analysis sheds light on the underlying structure of our philosophical reasoning. Straipsnyje tiriamos paralelės tarp melagio teiginio ir įvairių filosofinio mąstymo aspektų. Pradedama tiriant melagio teiginį „Šis teiginys yra klaidingas" ir išryškinant jo autoreferentinį pobūdį bei kintančias tiesos vertes. Tuomet straipsnyje atskleidžiamos paralelės tarp melagio teiginio ir Hegelio spekuliatyvaus teiginio bei siūloma melagio teiginį interpretuoti kaip „kvazispekuliatyvų teiginį", kuris atspindi dialektinį mąstymą. Tolesniuose teksto skyriuose tiriami logocentrizmo problema, Zenono paradoksas, ginčas tarp realizmo ir antirealizmo ir determinizmas, parodant, kaip šie įkūnija panašias save neigiančias struktūras. Straipsnyje išryškinama pamatinė filosofinio mąstymo struktūra. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Problems / Problemos is the property of Vilnius University and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Problems / Problemos holder: Vilnius University dt: @attributes: year: 2025 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|