Against Public‐Facing Religious Bio‐Restrictionism.
Recent calls to include religious bioethics on the table in policy and other public‐facing contexts have been made on the grounds of respect. This paper argues that these same considerations of respect point to an obligation to exclude religious bioethics from public‐facing contexts. This is because...
| Publicado en: | Bioethics Vol. 39; no. 9; pp. 810 - 821 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Wiley-Blackwell
Nov2025
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=188606282&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 188606282 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 02699702 6PJ jtl: Bioethics issn: 02699702 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: Nov2025 vid: 39 iid: 9 pid: 480 pub: Wiley-Blackwell artinfo: ui: 188606282 10.1111/bioe.70013 ppf: 810 ppct: 11 formats: tig: atl: Against Public‐Facing Religious Bio‐Restrictionism. aug: au: Anantharaman, Muralidharan affil: Centre for Biomedical Ethics, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore su: Policy sciences Social constructionism Government policy Respect Medical care Bioethics Public opinion Decision making Ethics Social integration Religion Diversity & inclusion policies Religion & medicine sug: subj: Policy sciences Social constructionism Government policy Respect Medical care Bioethics Public opinion Decision making Ethics Social integration Religion Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences (except Biotechnology) Diversity & inclusion policies Religion & medicine keyword: bio‐restrictionism public justification reasonable disagreement religious bioethics respect social conservatism bio‐restrictionism public justification reasonable disagreement religious bioethics respect social conservatism ab: Recent calls to include religious bioethics on the table in policy and other public‐facing contexts have been made on the grounds of respect. This paper argues that these same considerations of respect point to an obligation to exclude religious bioethics from public‐facing contexts. This is because public‐facing religious bioethics is typically bio‐restrictionist in orientation and thus involves making demands on others that people could reasonably disagree with. At the same time, respect for persons grounds a public justification requirement according to which it is wrong to make moral demands on others that are subject to reasonable disagreement. Proponents of inclusion of these views are thereby committed to excluding such religious bio‐restrictionist views from public‐facing contexts. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|