When the Textual Critic Assigns Gender: Editing Catullus's Attis Poem.

Editors of Catullus 63 face a difficult decision: whether to choose a masculine or feminine pronoun or adjective for Attis after castration at six sites of textual dispute. This article argues that two schools of thought have developed to date: a psychological understanding of Roman gender that anal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Helios Vol. 51; no. 2; pp. 113 - 157
Autor principal: Weintritt, Jennifer
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Texas Tech University Press Fall2024
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=188640937&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 188640937
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        01600923
        1IFI
      jtl: Helios
      issn: 01600923
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Fall2024
      vid: 51
      iid: 2
      pid: 4212
      pub: Texas Tech University Press
    artinfo:
      ui:
        188640937
        10.1353/hel.2024.a984007
      ppf: 113
      ppct: 44
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 19.6MB
      tig:
        atl: When the Textual Critic Assigns Gender: Editing Catullus's Attis Poem.
      aug:
        au: Weintritt, Jennifer
      su:
        Catullus, Gaius Valerius, ca. 84 B.C.-54 B.C.
        Attis (Deity)
        Gender identity
        Pronouns
        Adjectives
      sug:
        subj:
          Catullus, Gaius Valerius, ca. 84 B.C.-54 B.C.
          Attis (Deity)
          Gender identity
          Pronouns
          Adjectives
      keyword:
        Catullus 63
        Galli
        gender diversity
        history of scholarship
        textual criticism
        trans history
      ab: Editors of Catullus 63 face a difficult decision: whether to choose a masculine or feminine pronoun or adjective for Attis after castration at six sites of textual dispute. This article argues that two schools of thought have developed to date: a psychological understanding of Roman gender that analyzes Attis's fluctuating emotions and a somatic one that locates gender identity in the body's (in)ability to change. Neither approach has won a consensus. Combining lessons from the poem's editorial history with premodern trans studies, I offer a different reading of Attis's gender, as entextualized, to provide new insights into interpreting and editing this long-standing textual problem.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Helios is the property of Texas Tech University Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Helios
      holder: Texas Tech University Press
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2024
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N