DE FIDE ORTHODOXA 36 COMO FUENTE DE FELIPE EL CANCILLER Y DE LA LECTURA ABRINCENSIS IN ETHICAM VETEREM.
During the first half of the 13th century, there was an assimilation of the recently received writings of Aristotle. In this assimilation, an attempt was made to incorporate Aristotelian writings into a Christian structure of thought, to which they could not always be adapted. In this process, the D...
| Publicado en: | Revista Española de Filosofía Medieval Vol. 32; no. 1; pp. 77 - 95 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Sociedad Espanola de Filosofia Medieval
2025
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| Sumario: | During the first half of the 13th century, there was an assimilation of the recently received writings of Aristotle. In this assimilation, an attempt was made to incorporate Aristotelian writings into a Christian structure of thought, to which they could not always be adapted. In this process, the De fide orthodoxa by John of Damascus played a very important role, being received with the authority of a sum of patristic theology and used as such in the discussions on free will that took place among the first great theologians, among whom Philip the Chancellor stands out. In this work, I will describe the interpretation of two authors from different areas, a theologian like Philip the Chancellor, and a Master of Arts, commentator on the Nicomachean Ethics. In this analysis, I will show two ways of incorporating and grasping the contributions of the great synthesizer of Greek patristics. Durante la primera mitad del siglo XIII se produce una asimilación de los escritos recientemente recibidos de Aristóteles. En esta asimilación se intenta incorporar los escritos aristotélicos en una estructura de pensamiento cristiana en la que no siempre puede adaptarse. En este proceso tiene un rol muy importante el De fide orthodoxa de Juan Damasceno que es recibido con la autoridad de una suma de teología patrística y absorbido como tal en las discusiones sobre el libre albedrío que tienen lugar entre los primeros grandes teólogos entre los cuales destaca Felipe el Canciller. En este trabajo describiré la interpretación de dos autores de diferentes ámbitos, un teólogo, como Felipe el Canciller, y un maestro de artes, comentador de la Ética Nicomaquea. En este análisis veremos dos formas de incorporar y absorber los aportes del gran sintetizador de la patrística griega. |
|---|