Ethical challenges confronted in non-clinical, public health research with young people in England.
This opinion piece emerged from a collaboration of mental health researchers working on the National Institute of Health Research 3-schools mental health programme in underserved communities. The aim is to encourage debate and reflection on the challenges encountered with university research ethics...
| Publicado en: | Qualitative Research Vol. 25; no. 5; pp. 1140 - 1154 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , , , , |
| Formato: | Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Sage Publications Inc.
Oct2025
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=188670640&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 188670640 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 14687941 NLI jtl: Qualitative Research issn: 14687941 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: Oct2025 vid: 25 iid: 5 pid: 344 pub: Sage Publications Inc. place: Thousand Oaks, California artinfo: ui: 188670640 182263612 10.1177/14687941241306241 188670640 ppf: 1140 ppct: 14 formats: tig: atl: Ethical challenges confronted in non-clinical, public health research with young people in England. aug: au: Barker, Rhiannon Plackett, Ruth Price, Anna Canvin, Krysia Hartwell, Greg Bonell, Chris affil: PHES, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK sug: subj: Public Health Research, Mental Health Ethics Committees Research Subjects In Adolescence Colleges and Universities Research Ethics England Qualitative Studies Human Rights Interpersonal Relations Diversity, Equity, Inclusion Research Methodology Liability, Legal Support, Psychosocial Consent (Research) Educational Status Social Class Research Subject Recruitment Stigma Research Protocols Accountability Safety Ethnic Groups Interview Guides Nonexperimental Studies Interviews Storytelling Stakeholder Participation Adolescence Adolescent: 13-18 years ab: This opinion piece emerged from a collaboration of mental health researchers working on the National Institute of Health Research 3-schools mental health programme in underserved communities. The aim is to encourage debate and reflection on the challenges encountered with university research ethics committees when undertaking qualitative research with vulnerable young people. We explore the tension between principles of safeguarding and protection of research participants, on the one hand, and the potential for this oversight to become obstructive and thus to effectively stifle the voices and experiences of an already marginalised population, on the other hand. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|