互嵌性秩序博弈: 基层社会冲突根源及其阻力探微——基于反向秩序的视角.
Social conflict is the key source and key code that determines social change and explains social movements. As a cornerstone of social stability, the level of social conflict management in counties plays an indispensable role in maintaining grassroots stability. Due to the close relationship between...
| Published in: | Journal of Xi'an Jiaotong University (Social Sciences) Vol. 45; no. 5; pp. 163 - 172 |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Article |
| Published: |
Journal of Xi'an Jiaotong University (Social Sciences) Editorial Office
2025
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | View this record in EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=188890617&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 188890617 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 1008245X MS6F jtl: Journal of Xi'an Jiaotong University (Social Sciences) issn: 1008245X maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: 2025 vid: 45 iid: 5 pid: 70101 pub: Journal of Xi'an Jiaotong University (Social Sciences) Editorial Office artinfo: ui: 188890617 10.15896/j.xjtuskxb.202505015 ppf: 163 ppct: 9 formats: tig: atl: 互嵌性秩序博弈: 基层社会冲突根源及其阻力探微——基于反向秩序的视角. aug: au: 胡锐军 affil: 国家教育行政学院 教育风险治理研究中心, 北京 102617. su: Social conflict Conflict theory Orderliness Social movements Community organization Modernization (Social science) China sug: subj: China Social conflict Conflict theory Orderliness Social movements Community organization Modernization (Social science) keyword: Chinese modernization county-level governance order genesis grassroots social governance mutual order-embedded game reverse order social conflicts social order 中国式现代化 县域治理秩序 反向秩序 发生学 基层社会治理 社会冲突 社会秩序 秩序互嵌博弈 ab: Social conflict is the key source and key code that determines social change and explains social movements. As a cornerstone of social stability, the level of social conflict management in counties plays an indispensable role in maintaining grassroots stability. Due to the close relationship between order and conflict, exploring social conflict governance issues from the perspective of order has always been an important research direction for scholars. forming different technical or logical paths. Conflict theory, together with functional theory and interactionism, constitutes the three major theoretical paradigms for analyzing the evolution of social order. However, most of these scholars consider order construction and social conflict governance issues from the perspective of positive order description. From the perspective of reverse order in genetics, the interactive characteristics of the evolution of social conflicts and changes in social order determine that the process of modernizing grassroots governance is a process of competition and replacement between old and new orders. The smoothness and stability of order changes directly determine the degree of risk. Analyzing the triggering roots and manifestations of social conflicts from the perspective of reverse order has become a possible and new path. This article takes the theory of reverse order as the analytical framework, and explores in depth the root causes and resistance manifestations of the interlocking order of grassroots social conflicts from the perspective of reverse order. Through normative exploration and empirical analysis, it is found that in the process of modernity, as China is in the sprint stage of advancing Chinese path to modernization, the change of governance order is constantly going through the competition, mutual exclusion and confrontation between the new and old orders. The new and old orders are mixed and replaced in the mutual exclusion, mutual fusion and interaction relationship of breaking the establishment. preservation and abolition. reflecting a very obvious embedded game form, which is mainly reflected in the interaction of six pairs of antithetical orders, namely: construction order and spontaneous order, rural order and urban order, difference order and equal order. rule of etiquette order and rule of law order, closed order and open order, inward rank order and outward order. It is precisely these new and old orders that are mutually embedded and mutually exclusive. The battle of style, tangible and intangible, constitutes an important source of resistance to the change of modern order and social conflict risk, because its game results will automatically project and reflect onto social risk sources, and manifest in different forms of resistance. Compared with previous research, the contribution of this article mainly lies in two aspects: firstly, it constructs a theoretical analysis framework of the reverse order perspective and the logical framework of the interaction and resistance extension between the positive and negative orders. further confirming that the trajectory of the change of social governance order in counties must be oscillating or even swinging and advancing: Secondly, specific forms of opposition between positive and negative orders were selected from the concrete forms of the ideal social order, and corresponding analyses were conducted on their resistance manifestations, revealing the root causes of social conflicts in counties, namely the resistance encountered or newly emerged in the process of the interweaving and interaction. between old and new orders, which includes both the natural obstacles of traditional order and the drawbacks of modern order itself, as well as new problems formed in the game between the two. This study breaks away from the traditional paradigm of social conflict research and conducts a detailed analysis of the root causes and resistance forms of county-level social conflicts from the perspective of reverse order. The ecological political model is a model that breaks through the game resistance and breaks through the constraints of existing circles and misconceptions in grassroots social conflict governance. 社会冲突是决定社会变迁、解释社会运动的关键和核心密码。作为社会稳定压舱石的县域, 其社会冲突治理水平对基层稳定起着不可或缺的作用。由于秩序与冲突形影相随, 从正向秩 序描摹来思考秩序建构和社会冲突治理问题形成了不同的技术路径或逻辑理路, 冲突论也由此与 功能论、互动论一起构成了分析社会秩序演变的三大理论范式。而从发生学的反向秩序视野看, 社会冲突演变与社会秩序变迁的交互特性决定了基层治理现代化的过程就是新旧秩序的较量更 迭过程, 秩序变迁的平顺、平稳性水平直接决定了风险的程度。从反向秩序角度分析社会冲突的 触发根源及其表现形式成为一种可能和新路径。在推进中国式现代化的进程中, 治理秩序的变迁 必然持续经历新旧秩序的较量。新旧秩序在破立存废的互斥互融交互关系中互嵌博弈, 主要体现 在建构秩序与自发秩序、乡村秩序与城镇秩序、差序秩序与平等秩序、礼治秩序与法治秩序、封闭 秩序与开放秩序、内向秩序与外向秩序等对举秩序的互嵌, 其博弈结果会自动投射和映衬到社会 风险源中, 由此构成现代秩序变迁的阻力和社会冲突风险的重要来源。 pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: Chinese refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y dt: @attributes: year: 2025 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|