Prioritizing Participant and Research Team Emotional Safety During Data Generation and Analysis in Qualitative Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Research: Development of a Framework Informed by the GENDER-Q Youth Study.
Conducting applied qualitative health research studies often involves discussion of sensitive topics that may impact the emotional safety of participants and researchers. While generic guidance exists to support researchers in prioritizing participant and researcher emotional safety, specific consid...
| Publicado en: | Patient Vol. 18; no. 6; pp. 597 - 609 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , , , , |
| Formato: | research tables/charts Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Springer Nature
Nov2025
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=188905068&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 188905068 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 11781653 91S4 jtl: Patient issn: 11781653 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Nov2025 vid: 18 iid: 6 pid: 237 pub: Springer Nature place: New York, New York artinfo: ui: 188905068 186800655 188905068 188905068 10.1007/s40271-025-00756-4 188905068 ppf: 597 ppct: 12 formats: tig: atl: Prioritizing Participant and Research Team Emotional Safety During Data Generation and Analysis in Qualitative Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Research: Development of a Framework Informed by the GENDER-Q Youth Study. aug: au: Kennedy, Shelby L. Jack, Susan M. Johnson, Natasha Couturier, Jennifer Rae, Charlene Klassen, Anne F. affil: https://ror.org/02fa3aq29 Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street W, Hamilton, ON, Canada sug: subj: Patient-Reported Outcomes Psychological Safety Health Priorities Research Personnel Research Subjects Data Analysis Human Descriptive Research Gender Affirming Care Multimethod Studies Transgender Persons Canada United States Conceptual Framework Quality of Life Funding Source ab: Conducting applied qualitative health research studies often involves discussion of sensitive topics that may impact the emotional safety of participants and researchers. While generic guidance exists to support researchers in prioritizing participant and researcher emotional safety, specific considerations for conducting virtual qualitative interviews to develop patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) remain limited. This article provides a framework to support PROM developers in prioritizing participant and researcher emotional safety when conducting virtual qualitative interviews. This framework is informed by the strategies developed and applied in the GENDER-Q Youth study, an interpretive descriptive study to develop a PROM for youth receiving gender-affirming care (GENDER-Q Youth). The GENDER-Q Youth study involved virtual concept elicitation interviews with transgender and gender diverse youth (aged 12 years and older) to understand important care-related experiences and outcomes. The interview data were then used to develop draft scales. Virtual cognitive debriefing interviews were conducted with concept elicitation participants to obtain feedback on the draft scales. Strategies to promote participant and researcher emotional safety were developed and implemented throughout data generation (i.e., concept elicitation and cognitive debriefing interviews) and data analysis. On the basis of knowledge gained from creating and applying safety strategies in the GENDER-Q Youth study, a framework was developed to support researchers in prioritizing participant and researcher emotional safety when conducting their respective virtual PROM development studies. This framework offers considerations to support researchers before data generation (e.g., scheduling interviews when support will be available, should an emotional safety concern arise), during data generation (e.g., conducting check-ins with participants), after data generation (e.g., providing opportunities for the interviewing researcher to debrief), and during data analysis (e.g., conducting check-ins with research team members). This framework can help PROM developers identify threats to emotional safety that may occur before, during, and after virtual data generation and during data analysis and facilitate the development of strategies and plans to mitigate these risks. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: research tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|