A comparative study of the theory of social understanding of the text and discourse analysis theories.

The theory of social understanding of texts was first introduced by Mohammad-Javad Mughniyah in his book Fiqh of Imam Sadiq (AS) as a novel approach to deriving rulings from juristic evidence, and Martyr Ayatollah Seyyed Mohammad-Baqer Sadr, by providing a rigorous formulation of it, considered this...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Interdisciplinary Studies in the Humanities Vol. 17; no. 3; pp. 101 - 131
Autores principales: Tadi, Mohammad Talebi, Khaled, Amir Rastegar
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Interdisciplinary Studies in the Humanities Summer2025
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=188918757&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 188918757
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        20084641
        KC95
      jtl: Interdisciplinary Studies in the Humanities
      issn: 20084641
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Summer2025
      vid: 17
      iid: 3
      pid: 22413
      pub: Interdisciplinary Studies in the Humanities
    artinfo:
      ui:
        188918757
        10.22035/isih.2025.5261.5002
      ppf: 101
      ppct: 30
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: A comparative study of the theory of social understanding of the text and discourse analysis theories.
      aug:
        au:
          Tadi, Mohammad Talebi
          Khaled, Amir Rastegar
        affil:
          Assistant Professor, Sociology of Law, Department of Law, Faculty of Jurisprudence and Law, Baqir al-Ulum University, Qum, Iran
          Associate Professor, Sociology, Department of Social Sciences, Faculty of Governance, Shahed University, Tehran, Iran
      su:
        Discourse analysis
        Jurisprudence
        Semiotics
        Verstehen
        Semantics (Philosophy)
        Interpretation (Philosophy)
      sug:
        subj:
          Discourse analysis
          Jurisprudence
          Semiotics
          Verstehen
          Semantics (Philosophy)
          Interpretation (Philosophy)
      keyword:
        discourse analysis
        Fairclough
        Foucault
        Laclau
        Mouffe
        Seyyed Mohammad-Baqer Sadr
        text
        van Dijk
        تحلیلگفتما
        فر کلاف
        فوکو
        لاکلا
        متن
        مو ف
        و دایک
        یدمحمدباقرصد
      ab: The theory of social understanding of texts was first introduced by Mohammad-Javad Mughniyah in his book Fiqh of Imam Sadiq (AS) as a novel approach to deriving rulings from juristic evidence, and Martyr Ayatollah Seyyed Mohammad-Baqer Sadr, by providing a rigorous formulation of it, considered this approach a turning point in the history of Islamic jurisprudence. The subject of discourse analysis, meanwhile, involves examining any semiotic phenomenon, including texts, speech, communicative events, and so on. The most significant common ground between discourse analysis and the theory of social understanding of texts can be considered the domain of "language." According tollinguists, meanings do not exist independently in the mind, rather, meaning resides in language, and to access meaning, one must understand the structure of language. In the social understanding of texts, it is also emphasized that the emergence of speech is not fully realized through literal, situational denotation alone, rather, the social implications of speech-that is, the rational presuppositions within the context in which the text is issued-must be considered, and a final interpretation is achieved through the combination of situational and social denotation. In this article, using an interdisciplinary approach and descriptive-comparative method, the social understanding of texts from the perspective of Ayatollah Seyyed Mohammad-Baqer Sadr is examined alongside discourse analysis from the perspectives of Foucault, van Dijk, and Fairclough. Subsequently, the role of employing discourse analysis and the development of interpretive tools in jurisprudential cases is discussed.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2025
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N